Revert Temporary Dispel "Fix"

Suggestions or Mechanical Requests for Classes, Feats, Races, Etc.

Moderators: Moderator, Quality Control, Developer, DM

User avatar
Ravial
Custom Content
Posts: 912
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 9:11 am
Location: Poland

Re: Revert Temporary Dispel "Fix"

Unread post by Ravial »

No.2 is a good idea as always.

No.1 is, in my opinion, not going to be very useful as a vast majority of builds that operate on not being pure-pure wizard archmages are quite feat starved. It'll be difficult to put in feats that lower the risk of dispelling if that means compromising other natural choices for arcane-magic-based characters. Give it a long think guys, try to hypothetically make mages, gishes, arcane sneaks with such feats (Which you probably have already done anyway) so that it doesn't end up like a waste of time and effort.
"I sometimes wonder if Ravial is actually rav'ialquessir irl" ~ Colonic 2017

~Viridiana Lydhaer - Retired. Silverymoon!
~Arundae Dyraalis - Retired.
~Amaevael Laelyssil - Retired, Selu'Taar on Evermeet
~Laeria Amarillis - #HideThePainLaeria

Ravial ~ By CommanderKrieg ~
User avatar
Uranus
Posts: 634
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:30 pm

Re: Revert Temporary Dispel "Fix"

Unread post by Uranus »

matelener wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:12 pmAs someone who plays from time to time a 25 CL character that cannot avoid dispels (dragon disciple gish), I disagree with that sentiment. In regular PvE play, I feel quite comfortable eating dispels - yea sure, they sting, but what compensates it is that with all the tools at my disposal, I can solo every boss/dungeon out there bearing no cost whatsoever (except the white dragon).

Majority of non-casters don't have that luxury. UMD isn't as reliable and in addition hurts the pocket.
You might want to revisit this take. You were getting +3CL with the DD since the class is bugged :D
Post Reply

Return to “Mechanics”