Page 2 of 3
Re: kraak helzak
Posted: Sun May 28, 2017 6:32 pm
by 7threalm
Kraak helzak as been a place for traditional dwarf rp, it is rp as a city-state, that has contacts with dukes, and various factions of swordcoast region, a fairly large standing army, and interest in the north, and the upperdark. The way the guild/city as been rp over the years, since 2011, and even before that with the ironfaar's. There is a small council that has the ear of the King (dovin battlehammer), to help direct his actions of the city state. (the king can be used because he is an npc's if there is a dm interested in dwarf lore.) Though not entirely dependent on the king, as there as been stints where dm support has less, and some where its been more, but dwarves live a long time
The leader of the council/guild promotes dwarf rp, requests dm event's, finds new members, and a lot of many other things. Also there is no reason a dwarf can't do other things with other guilds, many of the dwarves within kraak helzak have been in differen't guilds.
Think of it as being a citizen of baldurs gate, with influences on the leadership of the city if that is enough of an allusion.
Re: kraak helzak
Posted: Sun May 28, 2017 11:51 pm
by Karond
Theodore01 wrote:Amber Absinthe is still alive and kicking butts
As is Gordul Icebeard.
Oh and Sadie Ironfaar - i almost forgot my most charming dwarf
Who's managing KH nowadays ?
Are the guild tokens still given to members ?
I'm still there as the main admin. I remove/add members upon request within a day, as I've for the last 3 years, but that's all I do.
Re: kraak helzak
Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 3:08 pm
by Stonebar
Hey! Revenark is dead, not Stonebar! lol
The only IC leader left is Max, not duragin. Unless the king, or Max, or both select duragin.
It's not only for dwarfs. Gnomes too.
Yes *hugs all Gnomes awkwardly*
Why would anyone be removed from the KH forms in the first place? It's a city faction, not a guild so inactivity has nothing to do with membership. There are also Dwarves away ICly that have been critical to KH lore and would always have access to such information, removing them from being a member is disrespectful, and not lore supportive.
You are not even listed as a forum group leader, so I'm worried you used the KH account.
Edit: to 7th.
Re: kraak helzak
Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 5:14 pm
by Bagnose
Bagnose, Toejamb, Saurgroin, and all the other McClaggenès are still active!
Re: kraak helzak
Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 5:17 pm
by KraakHelzak
got you bagnose
Re: kraak helzak
Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 5:32 pm
by KraakHelzak
re added always summer
Re: kraak helzak
Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 6:59 pm
by LISA100595
I am with Stonebar, KH is a city faction, none of the names should have been removed. Especially not Stonebar Clan dwarves, without the permission of the Stonebar Clan Leader who is Bagnose at this time... and I've heard some of them were removed as well. Is there a list of removed names so that they can be re-added?
Re: kraak helzak
Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 8:17 pm
by 7threalm
there where 150+ accounts, so every pm sent to kraak helzak was sent to these accounts, also there are places like the council of light who added the kraak helzak user group to their list of those that have access, so they also gained 150 accounts.
as well.
I am also sure all those guilds enjoyed those accounts viewing all their messages, even though they were address to kraak helzak.
I will also try and add every active -semi active rp dwarf account in the private forum since january back to the list.
or we could make the kraak helzak forums public, which is another option
Re: kraak helzak
Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 3:54 am
by Steve
Maybe Kraak Helzak should call a city-state conference, a gathering, where all Clans can come together to have their existence recognized by the King, and a new "charter" drawn up stating the rolls Clans will take in the furthering of the King's and Clan's agendas on within the Sword Coast?
Something we can do IC to give our Dwarves representation and rolls within the structure of KH, such that KH no longer exists as such an empty entity with little life running through it?
Re: kraak helzak
Posted: Wed May 31, 2017 1:54 am
by Aeb Ankor
This is really douchy removing the inactive old timers...
Re: kraak helzak
Posted: Wed May 31, 2017 2:09 am
by Jhul
Me too...
Re: kraak helzak
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2017 2:13 pm
by kleomenes
Aeb Ankor wrote:This is really douchy removing the inactive old timers...
IMO, it only would be if when they ceased to be active they weren't allowed back in.
Re: kraak helzak
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2017 4:00 pm
by Dagesh
I'm not sure what to do w/ Rorick. I like him and RP w/ the dwarves hit some really high notes but having KH so far removed from other hubs of RP makes it hard to interact when so few dwarves are actively logged in. On top of that, I have been running a different PC as a main for some time. I feel like a terrible human being for not being active as I think that attendance is a spiral, up or down, based on critical mass or lack of people and so not being on means one less person to incentivize someone else to hop on their dwarf.
In short, feel free to remove me from the boards unless you all want Rorick around. Otherwise I can probably just ask to be re-added. Thanks.
Re: kraak helzak
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2017 3:29 pm
by Aeb Ankor
kleomenes wrote:Aeb Ankor wrote:This is really douchy removing the inactive old timers...
IMO, it only would be if when they ceased to be active they weren't allowed back in.
My forum account has never been inactive for more than a week, yet I was removed even being one of the oldest dwarven player account from early Ironfaar times.
Removal en-mass seems highly suspect
Also still not been re-added
Re: kraak helzak
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2017 4:43 pm
by 7threalm
I would re-add you but someone change the password to the kraakhelzak account, and I would I assume it was stonebar, or alwayssummer, or mrieider as they were the only ones with access. Sorry Aeb
can you add him karond