After stepping away from the thread for a couple hours, going on a short drive, and chatting with some people in discord, I decided to revisit this thread. Hopefully what I have to say will be listened to.
Before I begin, I want to point out that this:
I think this is because harassment issue (both IRL and the one described in the thread) is something that female players, sadly, encounter. Being a male player, your chances to find yourself in the same situation are almost non-existant. This is something that is not important for you, but important for them.
is unwelcome, and antithetical to a discussion. Yes, I am a male. Yes, males are much less likely to encounter harassment and assault, sexual or otherwise. But it happens, and no one here knows me or my story. And likely you never will. For now, suffice it to say that yes, I do have a dog in this fight. Dismissing someone's opinion because of their sex/gender is wrong.
Now, back to the subject matter.
I absolutely agree that harassment is an issue. I absolutely agree that if someone is uncomfortable with something, they should speak up. And I absolutely agree that if someone speaks up and then the behavior continues, it is harassment. And I don't want to belittle anyone's experiences that lead to them having the comfort zones that they have, like my experiences have been in the above quote.
However, for me and my wife, we have a scale when it comes to comfort level. We realize that we cannot control everyone's actions, and that some things will make for a better story, even if it's not how we want it to work out. We have soft lines, and we have hard lines. If something crosses a hard line, it's an instant report. I had to do this just this past week. But some behaviors, we have to take a look and say "I don't like this. But does it cross a line I'm unwilling to let be crossed?"
Then, we have to decide what to do about the offending party. "They crossed this line. Do we report it, or just stay away from them?" Essentially. I personally try not to report anything I can either live with, or avoid, unless it crosses a hard line. I have a couple toons that even if I'm in deep RP, if they show up, I leave the area. If the behavior is totally OOC, like sending /t and such, obviously that can't be avoided, and must be reported.
The issue with flirting, is we have such a large gray area, that is subjective on both sides. Let me be clear.
Harassment isn't subjective, but
flirting is. A wink may or may not be flirting. A compliment may or may not be flirting. Even a grin or smirk may or may not be flirting. So, if we have a behavior that one takes as flirting, but the other person does not, we have created an issue. "I told him OOC to stop flirting, but he did it anyway", whereas, from the player's perspective there was no flirting. Rather than get rid of harassment, we have then created an atmosphere of hostility. And
that is what I'm trying to avoid here.
No one wants to have to think, "Is it ok if I do this action?" It should be clear what is ok and what is not. And that is the issue I have with flirting. Especially knowing myself, when I (both IC/IRL) have been told I was flirting when it was not my intent at all. I was on a college trip (Even though I was in my 30s) and my roommate was surprised to see me come to my room one night. He literally told me, "I thought you were going to be sleeping with x tonight". Here I was, a married man with three kids, just being nice to a woman, and evidently my whole class on my trip thought I was flirting with this girl who was ten years younger than I was. On top of that,
she thought I was going to spend the night with her. When I absolutely did not intend to send those signals.
So yes. Flirting is a volatile subject for me when people try to make it an objective line. Because what one person believes is flirting may not be intended. So, even if told OOCly, "Don't flirt with my toon, it makes me uncomfortable", we are now opening the doors to many "he said, she said" moments if we try to report it as harassment, rather than just avoiding the offender, assuming that the behavior continues purely IC.
Hopefully my point now is a lot clearer, and people will read the whole thing.