Baldur's Gate : The Sword Coast Chronicles : NWN2 Persistent World

Akroma666 wrote:If this server allows ERP, I'm quitting..
If you want ERP, go make a reddit account and join a sub forum. This is a game.. Not a fetish outlet.

If violence is erotic to the player, then grinding is actually ERP

Anyway, that is why the 3rd poll option exists!

From this point on, my Scry Status shall forever be ERP Emperor

Young Werther wrote:

Kagger911 wrote:Drugs

Drugs include alcohol in my view of the world. Pipeweed could be equated to tobacco if that was really an issue. LotR was a pg-13 movie... and I still don't see the problem with it in particular. But whatever. I've seen all these rules bent or broken in consensual role play to where I personally don't think it matters much. This is the internet folks.

*proclaims neutrality*

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Actually, if anyone does research, Pipeweed as discribed in LoTR novels, is not like marijauana nor does it get you stoned, in fact it states in the novels that:

There is another astonishing thing about Hobbits of old that must be mentioned, an astonishing habit: they imbibed or inhaled, through pipes of clay or wood, the smoke of the burning leaves of a herb, which they called pipe-weed or leaf, a variety probably of Nicotiana.

Nicotiana: an ornamental plant related to tobacco, with tubular flowers that are particularly fragrant at night.

It does not have drug like affects.
Anyone rp'ing 'pipeweed' as it is in LoTR as getting them high is actually confusing or warping the lore of it.

Devil weed would be more accurate, wouldn't it? I think that was the marijuana equivalent in dnd, albeit with crazy side effects.

metaquad4 wrote:

Akroma666 wrote:If this server allows ERP, I'm quitting..
If you want ERP, go make a reddit account and join a sub forum. This is a game.. Not a fetish outlet.

If violence is erotic to the player, then grinding is actually ERP

Anyway, that is why the 3rd poll option exists!

Anyone else find it ironically amusing that the most fervent rp supremacists are arguing (AGAINST) allowing and creating more rp? I guess some are not as fervent for rp as they would like us to believe.

I voted for the #3, because I really like to roleplay sadistic stuff, especially with mouses.

V'rass wrote:Anyone else find it ironically amusing that the most fervent rp supremacists are arguing (AGAINST) allowing and creating more rp? I guess some are not as fervent for rp as they would like us to believe.

While I don't support limitations like this in a general sense (Although I have expressed my some of my opinion on this particular topic above), I don't think this is a fair accusation. They (The "RP Supremacists") generally argue for higher quality RP within the scope of RP that is already allowed.

Quality over quantity is a fair and valid point of view, even if you hold the stance that you can increase quantity AND quality, as I do.

True... but if you can have both, why not have both?

If we have both server or 2 server we could have one for pg 13 or one for 18+

Exactly... good idea Lock

except server 2 is the test server and not to mention updates would literally take twice as long...

Gonna suggest it again : Top remains pg 13, bottom becomes pg 18. You consent for the change in PG when you cross that middle ground, the netherese ruins. Would fit well for this server that tries to please as many people as possible.

As far as I go.. Either player side or DM side if someone starts RPing blood guts and gore in disturbing detail I am just going to log out.. If the server allows it it allows it.. Making the server PG 13 is far easier than saying it is PG 18 and then trying to micromanage every nuanced ruling as to what is too much.

I try to remain light hearted and joking, fun and in a youthful sort of way.... I can see that quickly getting ruined by allowing the server to "mature".. though I don't see needing sex and graphic gore and obscenities in a game as being a "mature" mentality in the first place..