Thorsson wrote:2. That's part of the job mate, but if you want a pat on the back, there's one here for you. *pat*
The last i need is a pat in the back. Never asked for one. I learned to try to get the things i want on my own and try to have fun even if things dont go my way. If you are speaking for yourslef though i would be happy to give you one
Not seeing the relevance to the topic at hand though.
Relevance? is this a joke? MAte we are posting in the public forums. About half of the posts are not relevant.
BTW I haven't read back, but I think my default position here was against a FS nerf. The more you protest, the more I seem to be in favour of it, because your arguments are weak.
That doesnt concern me a bit. Like chambo said, it is my right to argue, even if they are weak
Thorsson wrote:chad878262 wrote:The March update was HUGE and include vast amounts of undocumented fixes/changes/additions/etc.
I can't say I was aware of all the ramifications at the time and I'm not sure how many others were either. Lots of new Feats I'd never heard of, which I don't agree with and which are buggy, would have better been left out. Clearly some things had been tested well and others hadn't. Maybe the only option was all or nothing, but I find that hard to believe.
It was all or nothing. Everything had been implemented. To break it down would basically mean start all over it again. Two years worth of changes. PM Maecius if you still dont believe.
The 100% RCR that arose is a separate issue and not directly tied to the update. Although I'm not in favour of it, it clearly enjoys the support of the majority and would have done, update or no.
The 100% RCR is the result of the update and directly tied to it. No update, no 100% RCR. End of the update issues, end of the 100%RCR