Baldur's Gate : The Sword Coast Chronicles : NWN2 Persistent World

Rasael wrote:Teleport has a 5% fail chance, if I remember correctly.

genbor wrote:Having a pretty big Cooldown issue with my Rage. I should be able to activate Rage 7 (8 in the future) times per day, and I have no issues in doing that if I stay on a map. If I go through a transition though, it imposes ridiculous cooldown times of 2-5 hours. This is one of the reasons why I never use Rage unless I need to, even though I could just constantly be Raging.

Tsidkenu wrote:Because you have divination as your prohibited school. Either change your prohibited school, or if you have already then live with the consequences of your choice

Administrator wrote:

DM RULINGS

Teleportation Runestones

Runestones exist as a mechanism to allow the teleportation (including tree stride) system to work. They are a deviation from the way teleport works in pencil and paper D&D required by the limitations of the NWN2 game engine. It is still the case, however, that PCs are only intended to be able to teleport to places they have themselves visited and a mechanical fix for trading of marked runestones is on its way.

Until any fix comes IG the following ruling applies from the date of posting:

- Teleportation has an IC gold cost that represents reagents and preparations. This does not need to reflect a huge sack of gold being expended at the moment of teleportation.
- Unmarked runes (and leaves) are tradeable items with a weight and gold cost.
- Marking a rune (or leaf) is an IC act, and owning the rune (or leaf) is IC.
- The location stored on a rune (or leaf) is NOT tradeable and runes should not be traded with a location stored in them. This is because, IC'ly, knowledge of a location is required in order to be able to teleport (or tree stride) to it.
- Using a rune (or leaf) with a stored location on it which was acquired by trade is forbidden. It should be considered in effect a form of metagaming.
- The spell description for Mark Rune is in error and has been amended on the forums as follows. Please consider the IG description in error and we apologise for any confusion. We will update it as soon as we can:

Hidden: show

http://www.bgtscc.net/viewtopic.php?p=58789#p58789 wrote: Mark Rune
Caster Level(s): Clr 0, Wiz / Sorc 0
School: Universal
Descriptor(s):
Component(s):
Range: Personal
Area of Effect / Target: Location
Duration: Permanent Inscription of a Rune
Save: n/a
Spell Resistance: n/a
You inscribe a rune with the location you are currently occupying and link it to that location permanently. The rune may then be used to provide a connection to the location for teleportation magic. Unmarked runes can be traded. Marked runes cannot be traded as actual knowledge of the location is required to teleport. Use of a traded rune's location is considered a form of metagaming. By targeting a rune that is already marked you can remove the binding spell

Akroma666 wrote:The description reads universal still and it DEFINITELY should be. Can QC or DM staff please review this decision.

Aurali wrote:Sembian Fencing doesn't seem to be giving the proper bonus to AB. I have 6 attacks per round so it should add 8 AB and 4 dex. With weapon finesse, that should add 10 to my AB. It looks like it is only adding 7 total. It does add the 4 dex so it looks to count the number of attacks properly.