Baldur's Gate : The Sword Coast Chronicles : NWN2 Persistent World

Is it possible for my character to become a goddess? I am pretty sure she already has one worshipper if that helps.

Laughingman wrote:Is it possible for my character to become a goddess? I am pretty sure she already has one worshipper if that helps.

Why derail the thread with such? I take this post as an act of ridiculement, same goes for others who've actually made posts that basically is just mocking the topic.

Laughingman wrote:become a goddess?

Obtain Divine Rank 0 and you're golden.

Incarnate wrote:

Laughingman wrote:Is it possible for my character to become a goddess? I am pretty sure she already has one worshipper if that helps.

Why derail the thread with such? I take this post as an act of ridiculement, same goes for others who've actually made posts that basically is just mocking the topic.

Dude. A few days ago you made up 32% of the posts on the front of the suggestions board. When almost a third of recent suggestions are you rapidly asking for things that won't and shouldn't happen, you should expect some ridicule on your less likely suggestions.

I think people have been more than accommodating, but you seem to refuse to address the points outlined against you.

CleverUsername123 wrote:

Incarnate wrote:

Laughingman wrote:Is it possible for my character to become a goddess? I am pretty sure she already has one worshipper if that helps.

Why derail the thread with such? I take this post as an act of ridiculement, same goes for others who've actually made posts that basically is just mocking the topic.

Dude. A few days ago you made up 32% of the posts on the front of the suggestions board. When almost a third of recent suggestions are you rapidly asking for things that won't and shouldn't happen, you should expect some ridicule on your less likely suggestions.

You know, suggesting or asking for things that are less likely to happen, doesn't mean I deserve to be ridiculed or have my posts ridiculed - seriously, there is something called behaving appropriately and in a mannerly way. Just because I'm very active and have a lot of ideas, questions, expectations, etc. that isn't equal to the majority of people here or some would find weird or isn't exactly what they'd like to read, certainly doesn't give anyone the right to behave this way towards me on any one else on the forum.

Dragonslayer wrote:I think people have been more than accommodating, but you seem to refuse to address the points outlined against you.

I'm not refusing anything - I just have a different opinion, and you know I've made a lot of good points too, which many also have refused to accept. I understand there are issues with making players able to play a lich, but I do think that overall its a good thing to at least consider what this could open up to. The necropolitan was mentioned, something like this could open up to players also becoming able to play liches at some point

Personally I'd rather play something else than knowing build a character towards a point I know will mean the retirement of it, like for instance playing character that from the beginning is being built towards becoming a lich, I would rather just play the necromancer part instead - HOWEWER playing the same character where it has gotten to the point where its time to retire it and it makes sense to make it a lich, then I'd more open to retiring it because for instance I'm tired of playing the character.

You quite literally had a DM outline the reasons for not doing this, echoed en mass by senior players.

No, you don't deserve to have suggestions ridiculed. But if you consider the above posts to be mean-spirited, then I'd advise you to grow some thicker skin (in my own opinion). You've made your points, DM's and players have countered them, so that should be the end of the conversation.

Suggestions are great, in my opinion. They provide sometimes a much needed change in outlook. But at the end of the day, the DM's and the DEV's are the ones putting in the man hours, and they decide what is acceptable and what isn't. Not us.

Dragonslayer wrote:You quite literally had a DM outline the reasons for not doing this, echoed en mass by senior players.

Yes indeed, but I also put forth good arguments and reasons in relation to those reasons brought forth, most of those were not countered or even considered, they were met with the same answer.

Dragonslayer wrote:No, you don't deserve to have suggestions ridiculed. But if you consider the above posts to be mean-spirited, then I'd advise you to grow some thicker skin (in my own opinion). You've made your points, DM's and players have countered them, so that should be the end of the conversation.

Its not a matter of considering them mean-spirited, but its the fact that its being done, ridiculing and derailing a thread is just plain-outright disrespectful to the people who're actively engaged in it and most certainly to the op. Additionally its not constructive to the topic and debate going on - either stay on topic on don't post. Same with, don't have anything constructive to contribute with, then don't post either.

Actions like those where they're purposefully derailing the thread, posting things that is a detriment to the topic and post, detriment to thread and op, attacks, flaming etc. Those are usually viewed as an act of trolling on most forums.

Dragonslayer wrote:Suggestions are great, in my opinion. They provide sometimes a much needed change in outlook. But at the end of the day, the DM's and the DEV's are the ones putting in the man hours, and they decide what is acceptable and what isn't. Not us.

I agree, and I can't do anything else other than to voice my opinion which I ended up doing.
Which basically what I was trying to do as well, to provide a possibility a change in the outlook of things.