Is this ranger build awful, or playable?
-
fearknight2003
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 8:53 pm
Is this ranger build awful, or playable?
I'm not looking for a godmode build. It's mostly for RP; I have half of a backstory worked out for this character. But is he playable? He's intended to wear +3, +4, or +5 Leather and dual-wield scimitars.
http://nwn2db.com/build/?241191
If he's useless in a fight, tell me what you'd suggest I change, please.
http://nwn2db.com/build/?241191
If he's useless in a fight, tell me what you'd suggest I change, please.
Last edited by fearknight2003 on Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
It was a fun year (I think). Bye.
- YourMoveHolyMan
- Recognized Donor
- Posts: 988
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:11 pm
- Location: Alabama
Re: Is this ranger build awful, or playable?
You can do without dodge, instead take protective ward which adds +1 ac (without conditions), and this improves to +2 ac at ranger level 24.
You don't need blindfight, rangers get it from a level 1 buff.
Since you are going pure ranger, I highly recommend natural bond instead of mobility, and exchanging one of your epic feats for epic animal companion, which will improve your animal companion, which is quite handy, really.
I also highly recommend expose weakness as an epic feat, since you are going two weapon fighting and high dex. Is scimitar a finesseable weapon? You may want to double check that but I do not believe it is, may want for short swords or hand axes instead (theres a pretty neat looking woodsmanish handaxe model ingame).
You don't need blindfight, rangers get it from a level 1 buff.
Since you are going pure ranger, I highly recommend natural bond instead of mobility, and exchanging one of your epic feats for epic animal companion, which will improve your animal companion, which is quite handy, really.
I also highly recommend expose weakness as an epic feat, since you are going two weapon fighting and high dex. Is scimitar a finesseable weapon? You may want to double check that but I do not believe it is, may want for short swords or hand axes instead (theres a pretty neat looking woodsmanish handaxe model ingame).
Michael Dunn
“There is more than one sort of prison, Captain," Chirrut said. "I sense that you carry yours wherever you go.”
“There is more than one sort of prison, Captain," Chirrut said. "I sense that you carry yours wherever you go.”
-
fearknight2003
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 8:53 pm
Re: Is this ranger build awful, or playable?
Thanks; I thought scimitar was finessable. I'll switch it to Handeaxes and swap out some feats.
It was a fun year (I think). Bye.
-
fearknight2003
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 8:53 pm
Re: Is this ranger build awful, or playable?
Sorry for the double-post.
Protective Ward seems to be given automatically, as I look over the extra class feats. If it is not that way on the server, I'll just take Protective Ward instead of Dodge and use Dodge as a placeholder.
Protective Ward seems to be given automatically, as I look over the extra class feats. If it is not that way on the server, I'll just take Protective Ward instead of Dodge and use Dodge as a placeholder.
It was a fun year (I think). Bye.
- Rhifox
- Custom Content
- Posts: 3964
- Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 2:34 am
Re: Is this ranger build awful, or playable?
Ranger on NWN2db gives Protective Ward, Natural Bond, and Epic Animal Companion automatically. This is not the case on BG. On BG you have to take all those with your normal feats.
Tarina — The Witch of Darkhold, a dealer in spirits and black magic
-
fearknight2003
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 8:53 pm
Re: Is this ranger build awful, or playable?
Alright, I just made a note of what feats are placeholders.Rhifox wrote:Ranger on NWN2db gives Protective Ward, Natural Bond, and Epic Animal Companion automatically. This is not the case on BG. On BG you have to take all those with your normal feats.
It was a fun year (I think). Bye.
-
DM Nilbog
- Posts: 1659
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 7:54 pm
Re: Is this ranger build awful, or playable?
If you really keen on the scimitars try going Str based ranger and taking the Oversized two weapon feat.
-
fearknight2003
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 8:53 pm
Re: Is this ranger build awful, or playable?
I already swapped it out for handaxes, actually.DM Nilbog wrote:If you really keen on the scimitars try going Str based ranger and taking the Oversized two weapon feat.
It was a fun year (I think). Bye.
-
fearknight2003
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 8:53 pm
Re: Is this ranger build awful, or playable?
I switched out Perfect Two-Weapon for Expose Weakness, because DB lists it as a feat the ranger gets automatically anyways.
The Ranger gets Perfect Two-Weapon automatically on BGTSCC, right?
The Ranger gets Perfect Two-Weapon automatically on BGTSCC, right?
It was a fun year (I think). Bye.
- Thorsson
- Posts: 1293
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 4:17 pm
Re: Is this ranger build awful, or playable?
Yes, with 21 levels.fearknight2003 wrote:I switched out Perfect Two-Weapon for Expose Weakness, because DB lists it as a feat the ranger gets automatically anyways.
The Ranger gets Perfect Two-Weapon automatically on BGTSCC, right?
Life is far too important a thing ever to talk seriously about it
-
fearknight2003
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 8:53 pm
Re: Is this ranger build awful, or playable?
Alright! So the build is good.Thorsson wrote:Yes, with 21 levels.fearknight2003 wrote:I switched out Perfect Two-Weapon for Expose Weakness, because DB lists it as a feat the ranger gets automatically anyways.
The Ranger gets Perfect Two-Weapon automatically on BGTSCC, right?
At 12th level, with the Blades of Fire spell and a few AC+ items, it is a freaking GOD.
As in, tank Sharpteeth with only a Barkskin, a Blades of Fire, and healing kits good.
It was a fun year (I think). Bye.
-
fearknight2003
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 8:53 pm
Re: Is this ranger build awful, or playable?
Does swapping Skill Focus Hide and Stealthy for Power Attack and Improved Power Attack help? Also, removed Epic Animal Companion, as Expose Weakness is more important.
It was a fun year (I think). Bye.
- mrm3ntalist
- Retired Staff
- Posts: 7746
- Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:31 pm
- Location: US of A
Re: Is this ranger build awful, or playable?
Isnt it a dex ranger?fearknight2003 wrote:Does swapping Skill Focus Hide and Stealthy for Power Attack and Improved Power Attack help? Also, removed Epic Animal Companion, as Expose Weakness is more important.
Mendel - Villi of En Dharasha Everae | Nikos Berenicus - Initiate of the Mirari | Efialtes Rodius - Blood Magus | Olaf Garaeif - Dwarven Slayer
Spelling mistakes are purposely entered for your entertainment! ChatGPT "ruined" the fun 
- Ghost
- DM
- Posts: 7310
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2014 12:12 pm
Re: Is this ranger build awful, or playable?
Moved to appropriate subforum.