Rune of ___
- Akroma666
- Posts: 1888
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 2:24 pm
- Location: California
Rune of ___
Question, are the rune spells worth it? Was thinking about taking rune of ice on a frost mage. Not sure if my immunity will protect myself from piercing cold? Also if the feat is worth it every 30 seconds... anyone help enlighten me?
Storm - The Blade Flurry
Druegar Grizzleclaw - The Mountain Ruin Tsar
Akroma Thuul - The Creepy Enchanter
Liliana Duskblade - The B*tch of Bane
Jamie Dawnbringer - The Light in the Darkness
Druegar Grizzleclaw - The Mountain Ruin Tsar
Akroma Thuul - The Creepy Enchanter
Liliana Duskblade - The B*tch of Bane
Jamie Dawnbringer - The Light in the Darkness
- mrm3ntalist
- Retired Staff
- Posts: 7746
- Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:31 pm
- Location: US of A
Re: Rune of ___
The frost mage ability ( piercing cold ) wont work with the rune.Akroma666 wrote:Question, are the rune spells worth it? Was thinking about taking rune of ice on a frost mage. Not sure if my immunity will protect myself from piercing cold? Also if the feat is worth it every 30 seconds... anyone help enlighten me?
Personally i dont like those feats and i have never bothered with them because i think they are not effective.
Mendel - Villi of En Dharasha Everae | Nikos Berenicus - Initiate of the Mirari | Efialtes Rodius - Blood Magus | Olaf Garaeif - Dwarven Slayer
Spelling mistakes are purposely entered for your entertainment! ChatGPT "ruined" the fun 
- Akroma666
- Posts: 1888
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 2:24 pm
- Location: California
Re: Rune of ___
Should I go with perhaps a winters blast feat? Just looking for a way to sustained damage things while summons run about.
Figured the rune of ice would be nice for a group setting. Thanks for the heads up about the piercing cold.
Figured the rune of ice would be nice for a group setting. Thanks for the heads up about the piercing cold.
Storm - The Blade Flurry
Druegar Grizzleclaw - The Mountain Ruin Tsar
Akroma Thuul - The Creepy Enchanter
Liliana Duskblade - The B*tch of Bane
Jamie Dawnbringer - The Light in the Darkness
Druegar Grizzleclaw - The Mountain Ruin Tsar
Akroma Thuul - The Creepy Enchanter
Liliana Duskblade - The B*tch of Bane
Jamie Dawnbringer - The Light in the Darkness
- Hawke
- Posts: 1245
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 6:11 pm
Re: Rune of ___
Honestly, I agree with mrm3ntalist to a point. Wizards generally don't have any sustained damage other than a crossbow/bow etc. But the damage those do is not really that great. Having a reserved feat does help... especially for the aoe ones.
Hit or miss, you aren't going to do a lot of damage, but you do burn up a feat. I have seen them used and the mages have done well with themselves in a fight, and I feel like I am useless compared to them. But to each their own.
Hit or miss, you aren't going to do a lot of damage, but you do burn up a feat. I have seen them used and the mages have done well with themselves in a fight, and I feel like I am useless compared to them. But to each their own.
If the text is this color, I am on duty, everything else is just my humble opinion.
- Lockonnow
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2010 12:10 pm
Re: Rune of ___
well you have some feat you can get but i allways find them bored
-
Eclypticon
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 7:26 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Rune of ___
Mechanically, you are better off not taking reserve feats and runes unless you go arcane trickster. We might want to consider if any changes should be made, but things seem pretty balanced as they are at the moment. Reserve feats and runes are not useless, but they offer another good low level play style option.
Frost mages are pretty cool RP wise and maybe something can be done. If piercing cold is to OP on runes, maybe we could adjust it a bit to limit total damage.
Frost mages are pretty cool RP wise and maybe something can be done. If piercing cold is to OP on runes, maybe we could adjust it a bit to limit total damage.