Baldur's Gate : The Sword Coast Chronicles : NWN2 Persistent World

In this post a thing is presented. It's something, most people, don't think about or care, to think about but I think they should think about it. Maybe you didn't think about the problem the way I think about the problem or maybe you do think about the problem but not as seriously as I think about the problem. Well, I'm here to tell you that it is a problem even if you don't think it is a problem or if you think it is a problem but not as much as I think it is a problem. So what is the problem? Well, that's the problem. Most people don't even know it's a problem even though it is a problem. If you don't agree, you're part of the problem. What I recommend instead is that the problem would instead not be a problem by making it not a problem anymore. The problem with that is no one has thought about the problem like I have thought about it or not as much as I have thought about the problem. As I see it, when we have this problem then it becomes problematic to everyone but the problem is that most people don't see the problem or don't take it as seriously as I see the problem. Overall if we made this not to be a problem anymore, it would be the best for everyone.

Look. You think it's a problem but it's not. I could tell you one hundred ways how the mechanics show it's not a problem. You only think it's a problem because you think it's a problem.

I can understand the OPs point with the problem but, and I don't want to sound mean, I think that maybe it's not as bad a problem. :shrugs: As I think about it, the OP does make some good points. The problem could be a problem if players saw the problem like the OP saw the problem. I know I used to see the problem the same way. Now that I don't see the problem that way, I don't see the problem that way. It took some time but there it is.

Maybe we could see the problem in a different way, though. If this other problem was a problem than there would definitely be a problem. It should be said though that there isn't really that big of a problem overall. So maybe the real problem is a different problem but not this problem.

I'm not trying to sound mean. Those are my 2 shekels, pennies, coppers, coins, cents.

Look. Neither of you see the problem because you're not, really looking at the problem. Think, of it this way. Here is the problem like, I said in the first post. It's a major problem and I've been thinking about this problem for a long time. I mean a, long time. When you see the problem as I see the problem and not like people who don't see the problem or like people who do see the problem but not like I see the problem, then you'd see the problem.

Your problem is exactly that, your problem. It's all fine and I love it. If you weren't such a (do-me-baby-I-can't-not-use-words) than this post wouldn't even exist.

No. You.


Idiot.

i have a problem with this thread. its problems like you that make non-problems into real problems. i dont see a problem with this line of problem solving and if you dont believe me i have a problem. and to further back up this problem i have with this problem i have a problem.

problem + problem = bigger problem
problem - problem = no problem
problem * problem = a huge problem
problem / problem = problem

you see

from the problem above you go no where discussing the problem unless you can be aware that you too are a problem.

Stop it

aaron22 wrote:i have a problem with this thread. its problems like you that make non-problems into real problems. i dont see a problem with this line of problem solving and if you dont believe me i have a problem. and to further back up this problem i have with this problem i have a problem.

problem + problem = bigger problem
problem - problem = no problem
problem * problem = a huge problem
problem / problem = problem

you see

from the problem above you go no where discussing the problem unless you can be aware that you too are a problem.

Clearly no post in this thread captures the real problem. The real problem is Disjunction introduction poses a problem for imperative inference by seemingly permitting arbitrary imperatives to be inferred. This is obviously An unintuitive consequence of conditional probability. In order to solve the problem, we must first determine the best decision-making method. However, selecting the best decision-making method is a decision problem in itself. In the end, logical thought is hard for humans and easy for computers, but picking a screw from a box of screws is an unsolved problem.

I find this highly problematic.

Dagesh wrote:If you weren't such a (do-me-baby-I-can't-not-use-words) than this post wouldn't even exist.

Double negatives are a problem...

What's your problem?

Deathgrowl wrote:What's your problem?

See? That's the problem I always see the problem is. It becomes so problematic.

Deathgrowl wrote:What's your problem?

You just made me snarf my afternoon coffee....it's a problem...my problem, but a problem none-the-less.