[Violate] refers to nonexistent spell

Items currently acknowledged by staff for fixing/further staff discussion (Only staff should put threads here to avoid confusion)

Moderators: Moderator, Developer, Quality Control, DM

Post Reply
User avatar
Kitunenotsume
Posts: 631
Joined: Sun May 17, 2020 10:57 pm
Location: UTC -7

[Violate] refers to nonexistent spell

Unread post by Kitunenotsume »

the Spell [Violate] states that
Through the power (of your deity) you penetrate protective abjurations of third level or less. Spells affected include Protection from [...] Negative Energy.
Weird kerning aside, Protection from Negative Energy does not appear to be a spell I can locate, unless it is intended to refer to Death-ward. If so, Death-Ward is normally at least a 4th-level spell, and thus not affected by Violate unless it's somehow intended to be effective against specialist domains like Death (which seems rather rude).
I play a baker. Sometimes she provides counseling or treatment.
Ask about our Breadflower daily special to save five coppers off a purchase of five pastries.
She seems unusually interested in cursed items.
She has also been seeking a variety of gems and stones.
EasternCheesE
Posts: 1947
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2018 8:51 am

Re: [Violate] refers to nonexistent spell

Unread post by EasternCheesE »

Kitunenotsume wrote: Sun Mar 27, 2022 2:21 pm the Spell [Violate] states that
Through the power (of your deity) you penetrate protective abjurations of third level or less. Spells affected include Protection from [...] Negative Energy.
Weird kerning aside, Protection from Negative Energy does not appear to be a spell I can locate, unless it is intended to refer to Death-ward. If so, Death-Ward is normally at least a 4th-level spell, and thus not affected by Violate unless it's somehow intended to be effective against specialist domains like Death (which seems rather rude).
Sadly, i didn't find any traces of any script actually checking for Protection from Negative Energy. As spell is marked as deleted in spells.2da, we don't refer to it in any piece of code.
Post Reply

Return to “Currently Under Review”