Rangers of Lolth
-
Eviloth
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 12:57 pm
- Location: Michigan, United States
Re: Rangers of Lolth
Well first off a thread needs to be going down to be closed. No one is being a jerk on this thread. The voice of reason? Why would you need to be the voice of reason on this?
We have presented the lore out of the the FR book itself. Honestly this is pretty much a solved case.
We have presented the lore out of the the FR book itself. Honestly this is pretty much a solved case.
"Seriously, the Maw?"Cazna Sshamath
"Dhaerrow, I will kill you then I am going to kill that little witch Yathrin you are leashed too.Le'alvath Greenbow
"Dhaerrow, I will kill you then I am going to kill that little witch Yathrin you are leashed too.Le'alvath Greenbow
-
Kruzr
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 3:44 pm
Re: Rangers of Lolth
Exactly why it should be closed. The case was (and I'm being flexible here) 'solved' on the first page. Voice of reason,yeah. No one is really being a jerk but we aren't saying things that make friends anymore.Eviloth wrote:Well first off a thread needs to be going down to be closed. No one is being a jerk on this thread. The voice of reason? Why would you need to be the voice of reason on this?
We have presented the lore out of the the FR book itself. Honestly this is pretty much a solved case.
-
CrispyWalrus
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 1:04 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
Re: Rangers of Lolth
Azrak Blackaxe, Dwarven Warrior Nyr Doch!
Deezgul Silverdelve, Dwarven Chanter The steel in dwarven spines
Fastolph "Sam" Ostgood, Hin Bladesman As good as his name... really
Deezgul Silverdelve, Dwarven Chanter The steel in dwarven spines
Fastolph "Sam" Ostgood, Hin Bladesman As good as his name... really
-
scriver
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 2:05 pm
Re: Rangers of Lolth
I didn't argue against Montaron's point precisely because I agree with it. I was already convinced earlier in this thread.Eviloth wrote:Well first off a thread needs to be going down to be closed. No one is being a jerk on this thread. The voice of reason? Why would you need to be the voice of reason on this?
We have presented the lore out of the the FR book itself. Honestly this is pretty much a solved case.
Edit: scratch that, I didn't see your and Kruzr's previous post, and thought it was directed at me.
-
Simian
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:42 am
- Location: On a Journey to the West
Re: Rangers of Lolth
It is not about convincing anyone, not after writing the same post over and over again in countless diffrent threads. What it does is just shows that one has had enough, and whoever is being the target of the 'vocal' outburst is just being stupid about something. That might hurt someones feelings, but at this point, it just a big 'meh' from my side.scriver wrote:Montaron, no matter how frustrated you feel, using all caps and a big font isn't going to make you sound any convincier.
"Qítiān Dàshèng (齊天大聖)"
"I warrant your attention?! Oh frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!"
"I warrant your attention?! Oh frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!"
-
scriver
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 2:05 pm
Re: Rangers of Lolth
Not at all. All it shows is that the all-cap poster is rude and control himself. In other words, it makes his target think the poster is stupid.
-
Simian
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:42 am
- Location: On a Journey to the West
Re: Rangers of Lolth
Teenagers... I suppose they'll get past that egocentric viewpoint sooner or later.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: Gee, you stupid.

A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: 2+2=5!
B: No, 2+2=4.
A: Gee, you stupid.
"Qítiān Dàshèng (齊天大聖)"
"I warrant your attention?! Oh frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!"
"I warrant your attention?! Oh frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!"
-
scriver
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 2:05 pm
Re: Rangers of Lolth
Really, Montaron. You first throwing a fit and then deriding people with that "ego-centric teenagers" card doesn't exactly show your own maturity in any favourable light. I still agree with you about the rangers, but you are quite clearly being the biggest child here.
-
Simian
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:42 am
- Location: On a Journey to the West
Re: Rangers of Lolth
I suppose that I'll leave you to develop for a few years more, I hope your perception regarding other's reactions and motives improves with time.
"Qítiān Dàshèng (齊天大聖)"
"I warrant your attention?! Oh frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!"
"I warrant your attention?! Oh frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!"
-
Eviloth
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 12:57 pm
- Location: Michigan, United States
Re: Rangers of Lolth
---------------------------------------
so let's be all happy pies again - I didn't go through all of the pages on this thread, but since the lore actually for FR supports drow rangers of Lolth, can we get them built into the game and other dieities/races?
so let's be all happy pies again - I didn't go through all of the pages on this thread, but since the lore actually for FR supports drow rangers of Lolth, can we get them built into the game and other dieities/races?
"Seriously, the Maw?"Cazna Sshamath
"Dhaerrow, I will kill you then I am going to kill that little witch Yathrin you are leashed too.Le'alvath Greenbow
"Dhaerrow, I will kill you then I am going to kill that little witch Yathrin you are leashed too.Le'alvath Greenbow
-
DM_Absolution
- Posts: 587
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:56 am
Re: Rangers of Lolth
Let's try and remain civil here, otherwise i will be forced to lock the topic.
- Absolution comes at a price -
- If thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss will also gaze into thee." -
-
Simian
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:42 am
- Location: On a Journey to the West
Re: Rangers of Lolth
That would require... uh...Eviloth wrote:---------------------------------------
so let's be all happy pies again - I didn't go through all of the pages on this thread, but since the lore actually for FR supports drow rangers of Lolth, can we get them built into the game and other dieities/races?
Editing the .tlk files, and somehow hooking rangers and spirit shamans with the standard deity selection instead of the druidic one.
"Qítiān Dàshèng (齊天大聖)"
"I warrant your attention?! Oh frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!"
"I warrant your attention?! Oh frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!"
-
Eviloth
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 12:57 pm
- Location: Michigan, United States
Re: Rangers of Lolth
http://nwn2.wikia.com/wiki/Nwn2_deities.2da
go click in the file for the ranger column 1= yes and it should fix it right?
go click in the file for the ranger column 1= yes and it should fix it right?
"Seriously, the Maw?"Cazna Sshamath
"Dhaerrow, I will kill you then I am going to kill that little witch Yathrin you are leashed too.Le'alvath Greenbow
"Dhaerrow, I will kill you then I am going to kill that little witch Yathrin you are leashed too.Le'alvath Greenbow
- gedweyignasia
- Custom Content
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2013 11:27 pm
- Location: EST/UTC-4
- Contact:
Re: Rangers of Lolth
Is this happening, or have we decided to stick with the restrictions in place?
-
Vekin
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 1:53 pm
- Location: England
Re: Rangers of Lolth
Who knows, I asked a similar question last year about rangers in general and got a no response and no further enlightenment why. There should really be a sticky somewhere with dead horse topics as this topic comes up quite often.gedweyignasia wrote:Is this happening, or have we decided to stick with the restrictions in place?