Questions - Invisibility/practiced Spellcasting
-
Morphix90
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 3:12 pm
Questions - Invisibility/practiced Spellcasting
Hello out there,
I've got some questions about the game mechanic on this server. I hope some more experienced player could help me with that.
1. Is the Practiced Spellcasting feat still worth to chose? I'd prefer to take some levels without spellcasting progression but there are other options for me too. How does the feat affect my casterlevel exactly now or is the Feat description of bgtscc still correct?
2. Invisibility: Is it right, that (friendly, players etc..) creatures could see a character who casts invisibility or similar spells on itself? But the effect work after entering another map. right?
Thanks for your help!
I've got some questions about the game mechanic on this server. I hope some more experienced player could help me with that.
1. Is the Practiced Spellcasting feat still worth to chose? I'd prefer to take some levels without spellcasting progression but there are other options for me too. How does the feat affect my casterlevel exactly now or is the Feat description of bgtscc still correct?
2. Invisibility: Is it right, that (friendly, players etc..) creatures could see a character who casts invisibility or similar spells on itself? But the effect work after entering another map. right?
Thanks for your help!
- Hoihe
- Posts: 4721
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 2:25 pm
Re: Questions - Invisibility/practiced Spellcasting
INvisibility works as normal without moving maps. Merely the VFX is being Bugsidian, and doesn't make you entirely invisible without transitioning. ICly, you're supposed to be invisible to the others if they don't have True Seeing/See Invis/Blindsight.
Practiced spellcaster can increase your duration, damage and people affected (also other Cl governed variables) 4 points higher than you'd have without it. Quite worth it imho.
Practiced spellcaster can increase your duration, damage and people affected (also other Cl governed variables) 4 points higher than you'd have without it. Quite worth it imho.
For life to be worth living, afterlife must retain individuality, personal identity and memories without fail - https://www.sageadvice.eu/do-elves-reta ... afterlife/
A character belongs only to their player, and only them. And only the player may decide what happens.
A character belongs only to their player, and only them. And only the player may decide what happens.
-
Karond
- Posts: 2221
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 10:47 am
- Location: Sweden
Re: Questions - Invisibility/practiced Spellcasting
1.) Practiced spellcaster has always been worth choosing. It adds a straight +4 to your caster level, so spells lasts longer (and in some cases, do more damage). This +4 bonus is added straight away, meaning that if you're a 5 wizard/1 rogue character, you'll cast spells like a level 9 wizard right away. Quite useful, wouldn't you agree? It also makes you harder to dispel.
2.) You're correct.
2.) You're correct.
-
Molag__Bal
- Posts: 2925
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:00 pm
Re: Questions - Invisibility/practiced Spellcasting
This is incorrect. You would cast spells as a 6th level wizard in your example. However, if you were a 5 wizard / 1 rogue / 1 ASoC, you would cast spells as a 10th level wizard. You need a spellcasting PrC for the practiced spellcaster bug to kick in.Karond wrote:This +4 bonus is added straight away, meaning that if you're a 5 wizard/1 rogue character, you'll cast spells like a level 9 wizard right away.
-
Azmodeth
- Posts: 350
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 12:12 am
- Location: Montreal
Re: Questions - Invisibility/practiced Spellcasting
I have multiple spellcasting prc's and Im only getting 1 lvl from it...
Azmodeth - Retired Frostmage, Abandoned all she had and left without warning.
http://www.bgtscc.net/viewtopic.php?f=1 ... g&start=30
http://www.bgtscc.net/viewtopic.php?f=1 ... g&start=30
-
ohboy007
- Posts: 339
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 5:30 pm
- Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Re: Questions - Invisibility/practiced Spellcasting
I think you have to have a non spellcasting class in there as well for it to work like SD which seems to be common. That right?
The Red Sorceress Sabel Faeria
Tommy Slick-Boot Bones (Rumored bounty hunter)
"Shhh! Pay the shadows no mind."
Nomusa Nuru (The Druid from Chult with mysterious arcane powers)
"With Ubtao as my witness, I shall find the evil that plaques my land and put an end to it."
Tommy Slick-Boot Bones (Rumored bounty hunter)
"Shhh! Pay the shadows no mind."
Nomusa Nuru (The Druid from Chult with mysterious arcane powers)
"With Ubtao as my witness, I shall find the evil that plaques my land and put an end to it."
-
Molag__Bal
- Posts: 2925
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:00 pm
Re: Questions - Invisibility/practiced Spellcasting
No, something like wizard 5 / EK 1 should be caster level 9 if you take practiced spellcaster. Unless a sneaky fix was implemented, you should still be able to end up caster level 33 by abusing this bug.
The only server limitation on practiced spellcaster is that you need to lose at least 1 spellcasting level in order to take it. So a wizard 10 / ASoC 10 / archmage 10 wouldn't be allowed to take the feat, while a wizard 10 / ASoC 10 / EK 10 would be able to.
The only server limitation on practiced spellcaster is that you need to lose at least 1 spellcasting level in order to take it. So a wizard 10 / ASoC 10 / archmage 10 wouldn't be allowed to take the feat, while a wizard 10 / ASoC 10 / EK 10 would be able to.
-
Karond
- Posts: 2221
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 10:47 am
- Location: Sweden
Re: Questions - Invisibility/practiced Spellcasting
Oh, right, forgot about that. Thanks for filling it inMolag__Bal wrote: You need a spellcasting PrC for the practiced spellcaster bug to kick in.
-
Eden
- Recognized Donor
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:19 pm
- Location: Look behind
Re: Questions - Invisibility/practiced Spellcasting
Remember that a caster lvl of 33 by abusing the Practiced Spellcaster feat is illegal if you're going for a pure build, since the feat is needed for multiclassing only, you cannot take it if you're going for a pure build. That's why sometimes a PrC is taken even if it's not needed.Molag__Bal wrote:you should still be able to end up caster level 33 by abusing this bug.
Remember them all it's just a game.
-
Considerate_
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:51 am
Re: Questions - Invisibility/practiced Spellcasting
It's allowed to take the feat to gain an advantage of +3 over the normal Caster Level of 30. It is not allowed to abuse the feat, to gain +4 caster levels above the normal cap of 30.Eden wrote:Remember that a caster lvl of 33 by abusing the Practiced Spellcaster feat is illegal if you're going for a pure build, since the feat is needed for multiclassing only, you cannot take it if you're going for a pure build. That's why sometimes a PrC is taken even if it's not needed.Molag__Bal wrote:you should still be able to end up caster level 33 by abusing this bug.
So if you make a level 20 wizard, level 10 Eldritch Knight (who only gets 9 Caster Levels), the feat would net you a caster level of 33 - which is legal.
If you make a level 20 wizard, level 10 Arcane Scholar of Candlekeep (which gets full caster level progression), the feat would net you a caster level of 34 - which is illegal, on this server.
Tamara - "I've seen colours you would never dream of"
Neschera - "Logic can bring you from one step to the next, creativity can bring you from anywhere to everywhere"
Neschera - "Logic can bring you from one step to the next, creativity can bring you from anywhere to everywhere"
-
Morphix90
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 3:12 pm
Re: Questions - Invisibility/practiced Spellcasting
Thanks for your repies!
Seems a bit clearer for me now.
interrupt me if I'm wrong:
So, it should be legal for me to take the feat because I decided to take some levels as PM OR full progression as BM(no progression at level 5 if I remember correctly).
And I assume that the bug affecting the Invisibility vfx even affects Ethereal Jaunt. Dont it?
Seems a bit clearer for me now.
interrupt me if I'm wrong:
So, it should be legal for me to take the feat because I decided to take some levels as PM OR full progression as BM(no progression at level 5 if I remember correctly).
And I assume that the bug affecting the Invisibility vfx even affects Ethereal Jaunt. Dont it?
- Hoihe
- Posts: 4721
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 2:25 pm
Re: Questions - Invisibility/practiced Spellcasting
It's legal aye.
For life to be worth living, afterlife must retain individuality, personal identity and memories without fail - https://www.sageadvice.eu/do-elves-reta ... afterlife/
A character belongs only to their player, and only them. And only the player may decide what happens.
A character belongs only to their player, and only them. And only the player may decide what happens.
-
ohboy007
- Posts: 339
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 5:30 pm
- Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Re: Questions - Invisibility/practiced Spellcasting
Kind of messed up a non pure caster gets a higher Cl than a pure caster. I know this of course is not intentional, and if there were an easy fix it would probably get implemented. Untill then does it seem fair to limit pure casters but not non pure casters due to a bug? Is Cl 34 that much a reach over 33 granted the pure caster went pure caster? Thought I'd ask and flesh out some opinions. Thx
The Red Sorceress Sabel Faeria
Tommy Slick-Boot Bones (Rumored bounty hunter)
"Shhh! Pay the shadows no mind."
Nomusa Nuru (The Druid from Chult with mysterious arcane powers)
"With Ubtao as my witness, I shall find the evil that plaques my land and put an end to it."
Tommy Slick-Boot Bones (Rumored bounty hunter)
"Shhh! Pay the shadows no mind."
Nomusa Nuru (The Druid from Chult with mysterious arcane powers)
"With Ubtao as my witness, I shall find the evil that plaques my land and put an end to it."
-
Leo
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:07 am
Re: Questions - Invisibility/practiced Spellcasting
Actually, there is an easy fix available. It would cap the use one can get out of Practiced Spellcaster feat at 30 CL max. So the Wizard 10/ Arcane Scholar of Candlekeep 10/ Eldritch Knight 10 that has 29 CL will only get +1 CL benefit from the Practiced Spellcaster. The staff decided they are happy with the current arrangement though. So the fix didn't went in.ohboy007 wrote:Kind of messed up a non pure caster gets a higher Cl than a pure caster. I know this of course is not intentional, and if there were an easy fix it would probably get implemented. Untill then does it seem fair to limit pure casters but not non pure casters due to a bug? Is Cl 34 that much a reach over 33 granted the pure caster went pure caster? Thought I'd ask and flesh out some opinions. Thx
-
Eden
- Recognized Donor
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:19 pm
- Location: Look behind
Re: Questions - Invisibility/practiced Spellcasting
Yeah, you explained it better than me. ThanksConsiderate_ wrote:It's allowed to take the feat to gain an advantage of +3 over the normal Caster Level of 30. It is not allowed to abuse the feat, to gain +4 caster levels above the normal cap of 30.Eden wrote:Remember that a caster lvl of 33 by abusing the Practiced Spellcaster feat is illegal if you're going for a pure build, since the feat is needed for multiclassing only, you cannot take it if you're going for a pure build. That's why sometimes a PrC is taken even if it's not needed.Molag__Bal wrote:you should still be able to end up caster level 33 by abusing this bug.
So if you make a level 20 wizard, level 10 Eldritch Knight (who only gets 9 Caster Levels), the feat would net you a caster level of 33 - which is legal.
If you make a level 20 wizard, level 10 Arcane Scholar of Candlekeep (which gets full caster level progression), the feat would net you a caster level of 34 - which is illegal, on this server.
Remember them all it's just a game.