Sorry, I came back with a ranger build.

Questions About Character Builds, Build Critiques, and Build Sharing

Moderators: Moderator, DM

finneas
Posts: 325
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 9:01 pm
Location: New York

Re: Sorry, I came back with a ranger build.

Unread post by finneas »

Passiflora wrote:Yeah, with an angry temperament. :D

Yadda yadda yadda prefers to wear leather armors or no armors at all!
But, I mean, who doesn't...
There is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never care for anything else thereafter. - Ernest Hemingway
The Fox's Bio
Kellan Armstrong's Bio
User avatar
Thorsson
Posts: 1293
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 4:17 pm

Re: Sorry, I came back with a ranger build.

Unread post by Thorsson »

You should maybe try using the Search function in NWN2DB.

Try these parameters:

Fighter - minimum level 12
Tempest - minimum level 5
Strength - minimum 23

And put BGTSCC in the Text Field (top left).

That'll get you a bunch of builds to have a look at, all of which will have good AB/damage and many of which have good AC (warning: some will be designed to work with Plate Armor, so don't just look at the naked AC). All designed for BGTSCC.
Life is far too important a thing ever to talk seriously about it
fearknight2003
Posts: 354
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 8:53 pm

Re: Sorry, I came back with a ranger build.

Unread post by fearknight2003 »

Thorsson wrote:You should maybe try using the Search function in NWN2DB.

Try these parameters:

Fighter - minimum level 12
Tempest - minimum level 5
Strength - minimum 23

And put BGTSCC in the Text Field (top left).

That'll get you a bunch of builds to have a look at, all of which will have good AB/damage and many of which have good AC (warning: some will be designed to work with Plate Armor, so don't just look at the naked AC). All designed for BGTSCC.
I already RCR'd into using Steve's build, but I'll look at that and see if there's anything better.
Thanks.
It was a fun year (I think). Bye.
chad878262
QC Coordinator
Posts: 9333
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 6:55 pm

Re: Sorry, I came back with a ranger build.

Unread post by chad878262 »

fearknight, if you are still interested in Ranger/WM as your RP idea here is my build suggestion. Still gets decent AC (w/out Wands you'd be at 37, 39 w/ the +2 MBP). You give up the Tempest AC, AB as well, but you have outdoor HiPS, Ranger Spells which can give you +5 Natural Armor and +4 Deflection AC meaning you only really need to worry about dodge boots. In addition you gain 3 APR from perfect 2 weapon fighting and 2d6 +5 bonus damage against your favored enemies. By picking favored enemies that are immune to crit, you could mitigate the downside of the weapon master. Anyway, here is the build, if you're interested:

http://nwn2db.com/build/?243988
Chord Silverstrings - Bard and OSR Squire / Tarent Nefzen - Arcane Wand Merchant and Master Alchemist / Irrace Arkentlar - Drow Adventurer / Finneaus Du'Veil - Gem Merchant and Executive Officer of SCCE

Tarent's Wands and Elixirs

A Wand Crafter's guide to using wands
User avatar
Thorsson
Posts: 1293
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 4:17 pm

Re: Sorry, I came back with a ranger build.

Unread post by Thorsson »

But there are downsides to the Ranger build:

1. Those nice spells are very dispellable

2. You only have 39 AB, meaning less hits per round - and less crits

3. Even if not dispelled your AC is less than other builds

4. You're not very quiet, i.e. not a great sneaker. Plus a lot of areas are not "outdoors".

5. Although you have FEs, you don't have the 8 damage against everything that F12 gets with EWS/MWM, plus whatever the other 9 levels bring.

6. Some of those Kaedrin goodies are not given on BGTSCC, like Protective Ward (has to be taken as a Feat) or Epic Animal Companion.
Life is far too important a thing ever to talk seriously about it
User avatar
Maecius
Retired Admin
Posts: 11639
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 4:24 pm

Re: Sorry, I came back with a ranger build.

Unread post by Maecius »

chad878262 wrote:correct, we both agree it Ranger/WM is not great synergy and brings downsides that were already discussed. I merely presented one that I felt mitigated some of that better than FK's original build in case the Ranger aspect was important.
fearknight2003 wrote:
Passiflora wrote:Yeah, with an angry temperament. :D

... Tattoos, bald? And prefers to wear ... no armors at all!
When did we start talking about Red Wizards of Thay?
Nyeleni wrote:Tsk, tsk, tsk, how can you not know about Minsc?
Hidden: show
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Character Building”