Issue with the new persistant storage system

It Does What It Says on the Tin: Resolved Issues

Moderators: Moderator, Developer, DM

Boddynock
Posts: 838
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:30 am

Issue with the new persistant storage system

Unread post by Boddynock »

Having the storage access for BG located in a PC controlled faction building is a bit of an oversight, as the faction could restrict PC access. There are other options within the city, such as the counting house, that are NPC operated and therefore more suitable.
Liam the Golden
Illdraen, Guerilla Skirmisher of Sshamath
Guy "Knife-Ears" Masterson
Boddynock Namfoodle, Illusionist Extraordinaire! (temporary leave of absence, again)

"Liam the Golden, so I have heard,
Yet truly none can polish a...
" - Ameris Santraeger, 2016
User avatar
Moltrazahn
Posts: 915
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:33 am

Re: Issue with the new persistant storage system

Unread post by Moltrazahn »

With no offence towards the faction in question, I am going to have to agree on this one. Giving an NPC of this importance to a pc-controlled location is a potential for player abuse (ei. "I don't like you anymore. The guards would no longer allow your character access in here"). Granted DMS could say otherwise, but rather avoid having to bring it up in the first place.

Rather place it outside the building in a booth or something. For the most part I (personally) am fine with the NPC have ties with pc-factions, but as long as it's services are open to all.
Za'than Za'amal(Elsewhere!)
Thumbler Trunk-son(Also Elsewhere!)
Inanis Umbra(Active)
Molag'ur(He stink!)

Myhun Kren: "You should change Za'thans mask to green, and run around yelling "Somebody STOP ME!"

"You are a spastic pony" - HDM Arrakeen
AlwaysSummer Day
Recognized Donor
Posts: 1170
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:27 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Re: Issue with the new persistant storage system

Unread post by AlwaysSummer Day »

Everyone knows this is the admin/staff member guild but still it seems improper. I really hope they move it somewhere neutral.
Roland; svirfneblin fist of the forest and eco terrorist.
Heinrich Von Rittermark; Everwatch Knights of Helm
Frederick Von Rittermark; Paladin of Azuth/Mystra
Erik Von Rittermark; Unknown
Tsidkenu

Re: Issue with the new persistant storage system

Unread post by Tsidkenu »

BG is big enough for two locations. Put one in the Merchant's League (Elad) or even the completely unused Lord's Alliance building thing. Leave the Bank alone. It was RPed for years, added and now it has a purpose.
User avatar
LISA100595
Retired Staff
Posts: 5202
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 12:23 pm

Re: Issue with the new persistant storage system

Unread post by LISA100595 »

I'm going to have to agree with you guys as well. It should have its own small location or stall or something open to all.
Lady Elvina Aira-S'efarro - The Order of the Silver Rose
Salaria - Bounty Hunter half-sister of Darius Brothers
Angelina Northstar - Holy Warrior of Tyr / Knight of the Silver Rose
Matilda Stonehold - Honorable Sheild Dwarf
Loriah Swift - Morninglord of Lathander
User avatar
Charraj
Posts: 2741
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 5:38 pm
Location: EST

Re: Issue with the new persistant storage system

Unread post by Charraj »

I agree with the OP, with no disrespect to staff.
Molly Longshot - Wheeee!
Sempo - Former butler, wandering priest
Mara - Paladin of Jergal
Tabby - Hedge witch, former bandit
Charraj Cain - Mystran. Dead.
DM Mister Rogers - It's such a good feeling to know that we're lifelong friends.
User avatar
matelener
Retired Staff
Posts: 973
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:02 am

Re: Issue with the new persistant storage system

Unread post by matelener »

In my opinion storage should be OOC - a druid might want to RP storing things in a forest hut, a wizard - heavily warded hideout within ruins etc. etc.

So, an access point could be placed also in an OOC area, in addition to wherever else it is now.
AlwaysSummer Day
Recognized Donor
Posts: 1170
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:27 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Re: Issue with the new persistant storage system

Unread post by AlwaysSummer Day »

matelener wrote:In my opinion storage should be OOC - a druid might want to RP storing things in a forest hut, a wizard - heavily warded hideout within ruins etc. etc.

So, an access point could be placed also in an OOC area, in addition to wherever else it is now.
An OOC storage system in the Nexus that can transfer between characters to help out with muling and allow us to RP dimensional pockets and hiding places. I could agree with that but it is a bit of a tangent to this thread.
Roland; svirfneblin fist of the forest and eco terrorist.
Heinrich Von Rittermark; Everwatch Knights of Helm
Frederick Von Rittermark; Paladin of Azuth/Mystra
Erik Von Rittermark; Unknown
User avatar
Endelyon
Posts: 3606
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 4:24 am

Re: Issue with the new persistant storage system

Unread post by Endelyon »

Tsidkenu wrote:BG is big enough for two locations. Put one in the Merchant's League (Elad) or even the completely unused Lord's Alliance building thing. Leave the Bank alone. It was RPed for years, added and now it has a purpose.
We can probably add it to the merchant league, as well, but the SCCE is an NPC owned faction just the same. The PCs that run it are going into retirement and there's plenty of other places that you can access the storage as already mentioned. No one said a peep about any of the other guilds who have mechanical incentives to get people to show up. EDE, Doron Amarillo, Candlekeep all have vendors, and the Thayans will soon. The WMT even has a player Quest. Why isn't anyone concerned that the WMT staff might not let them speak to Carl the janitor? :P

I once had a PC that was completely banned from the grounds of Candlekeep by other PCs, so admittedly this kind of thing does happen, but given that there are no more active PC members of decision-making capacity it shouldn't be an issue here.

Of course the merchants league has PC members as well, so maybe we had better put it in the middle of the woods on a random nameless NPC for no reason except to make sure that it has no chance of having player affiliation. :lol:
User avatar
mrm3ntalist
Retired Staff
Posts: 7815
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:31 pm
Location: US of A

Re: Issue with the new persistant storage system

Unread post by mrm3ntalist »

// removed, irelevant
Last edited by mrm3ntalist on Sat Aug 27, 2016 3:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mendel - Ranger, Harper, Villi | Elias Raemir The Unyielding Aegis | Tahlaer of the High Forest | Nikos Berenicus - Initiate of the Mirari | Efialtes Rodius - Blood Magus

Spelling mistakes are purposely entered for your entertainment! ChatGPT "ruined" the fun :(
AlwaysSummer Day
Recognized Donor
Posts: 1170
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:27 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Re: Issue with the new persistant storage system

Unread post by AlwaysSummer Day »

What is the WMT? When I asked about getting a quest for Kraak Helzak I was told a flat "not allowed ever" because it would not be fair. Of course I was also told guild halls were not allowed to have wards. Also there is significant difference between an NPC merchant in a town that a guild is present in and a bank in a building that is owned by a guild. These guilds cannot ban people from entering a town ever only a DM may. A guild may freely administer it's own building though.

It should be removed from the guild and replaced with one of the private guild storage banks when they come out as you mention in the other thread.
Roland; svirfneblin fist of the forest and eco terrorist.
Heinrich Von Rittermark; Everwatch Knights of Helm
Frederick Von Rittermark; Paladin of Azuth/Mystra
Erik Von Rittermark; Unknown
User avatar
Endelyon
Posts: 3606
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 4:24 am

Re: Issue with the new persistant storage system

Unread post by Endelyon »

AlwaysSummer Day wrote:What is the WMT? When I asked about getting a quest for Kraak Helzak I was told a flat "not allowed ever" because it would not be fair. Of course I was also told guild halls were not allowed to have wards. Also there is significant difference between an NPC merchant in a town that a guild is present in and a bank in a building that is owned by a guild. These guilds cannot ban people from entering a town ever only a DM may. A guild may freely administer it's own building though.

It should be removed from the guild and replaced with one of the private guild storage banks when they come out as you mention in the other thread.
It's a public business. What in the world would it be doing just offering private vault services to its employees? Again, though, if there is a point of access added at the merchants league that's not an issue, is it? People will have other options as to where they can do their banking business and the problem is solved.
User avatar
Rhifox
Posts: 3962
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 2:34 am

Re: Issue with the new persistant storage system

Unread post by Rhifox »

It's funny how averse people are to roleplay. The SCCE is finally able to actually function as the bank it is (because that's, you know, the whole point of the guild), and players think the bank should be moved "because players run it."

Frankly, the less things taken out of player hands, the better. There's no immersion to be found in dealing with mindless, inactive NPCs. I'd go so far to say that the only bank should be the SCCE one... until another player group decides to take the initiative to create an alternative.
Tarina — The Witch of Darkhold, a dealer in spirits and black magic
AlwaysSummer Day
Recognized Donor
Posts: 1170
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:27 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Re: Issue with the new persistant storage system

Unread post by AlwaysSummer Day »

So will other guilds get full banks? Will the other bank in BG be as accessable? I am sorry if I am annoying but I just do not like when one guild gets something special and it just so happens to be the staff/admin guild. I have seen what things that can do to a server first hand and I really do not want favoritism, bias, and (as another put it) power cliques to form here.
Roland; svirfneblin fist of the forest and eco terrorist.
Heinrich Von Rittermark; Everwatch Knights of Helm
Frederick Von Rittermark; Paladin of Azuth/Mystra
Erik Von Rittermark; Unknown
User avatar
Rhifox
Posts: 3962
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 2:34 am

Re: Issue with the new persistant storage system

Unread post by Rhifox »

AlwaysSummer Day wrote:So will other guilds get full banks?
If they put in the IC efforts to get one, sure! I know I've discussed among the Red Wizards in a previous meeting (before persistent storage was a possibility) to creating a banking alternative to the SCCE. Now that storage is in, this becomes a much more beneficial pursuit.
Will the other bank in BG be as accessable? I am sorry if I am annoying but I just do not like when one guild gets something special and it just so happens to be the staff/admin guild.
The bank guild gets a bank. How dare they!
Tarina — The Witch of Darkhold, a dealer in spirits and black magic
Post Reply

Return to “Solved Problems”