Dispel vs Caster Level

It Does What It Says on the Tin: Resolved Issues

Moderators: Moderator, Developer, DM

User avatar
Akroma666
Posts: 1888
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 2:24 pm
Location: California

Re: Dispel vs Caster Level

Unread post by Akroma666 »

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Storm - The Blade Flurry
Druegar Grizzleclaw - The Mountain Ruin Tsar
Akroma Thuul - The Creepy Enchanter
Liliana Duskblade - The B*tch of Bane
Jamie Dawnbringer - The Light in the Darkness
User avatar
Steve
Recognized Donor
Posts: 8185
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 5:42 am
Location: Paradise in GMT +1

Re: Dispel vs Caster Level

Unread post by Steve »

Well, to be fair, the scrolls shouldn't go higher than 29, but maybe 25 is decent enough?

And other cool and fun things COULD get added to help round out the edges: On Hit dispel weapons; Dead Magic Zones; longer Rest Timer, etc.

Honestly, if your build has HiPS, there is nothing to fret over! :twisted:

And there are, supposedly, Areas to go to and avoid any casters (meta game that shit boyeee!)

As well: it seems if you are low CL, just start your attack with Counterspelling active, and you have a very decent chance of resisting the Dispel.

Gael Ironfaar - To Battle Then...

Tsarzyn Ek'cla - Superiority Supreme

Wyndam Wyndarr
User avatar
Calodan
Posts: 2032
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:21 pm
Location: Missoula Montana BIG SKY COUNTRY

Re: Dispel vs Caster Level

Unread post by Calodan »

Well, to be fair, the scrolls shouldn't go higher than 29, but maybe 25 is decent enough?
Actually yes it would be. Would allow only SOME regular monsters to use dispel and greater dispel on you and actually work and those uber casters can still get you and the PvP would still work for dispelling those F/FB/WMs too. I agree! Just saying a max of 15 CL on scrolls is not going to cut it at any epic level EVER. Just a waste of the skill and gold. Hell I would even say they can leave the dispel caps where they are if they just let us craft scrolls up to level 25 or so. Make sure those scrolls are never put IG into a shop either and if they are they should be 4x more expensive than what a player can craft them for. That way a player can always make money on doing a scroll writer or something. One thing that kills scroll sales person to person is the shops that have them at rates that are lower than the crafting cost.

////PS Can we submit a discussion for UMD getting a Take 20 when not in combat? Danged UMD is useless for real scroll usage until level 18 or higher since you fail the checks all too often thanks to a fubar rig on die rolls in NWN2......
Kory Sentinel
"We should take the army head on!"

"... it sounds like a terrible idea, but look at that smile."
"And he just sounds so confident ... he is a favored soul."
"Even if we don't survive, he will, and isn't that what matters?" -Red Lancer
User avatar
Touri
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:43 pm
Location: GMT +1

Re: Dispel vs Caster Level

Unread post by Touri »

Hello all,

it is okay that dispel magic now works as it should, means versus the caster lvl. Unfortunatly by the amount of enemy that uses it, hybrid class characters get dispelled all the time. I think it is no problem if your umd spells or potions get dispelled. But with 15cleric/12fighter/3rogue ((remember a Pala or Ranger normaly has lvl/2 = casterlvl, max caster LVL would be 15))a greater dispel magic with 1w20 +20 will dispel you easily. DC is 11+15= 26 =>26-20=6 vs 1d20 => You get dispelled 70%. 55% by a lvl3 dispel.

You only can buy the cloak of spell ressistance 32 to lower it a bit.
1d20 + 20 Caster lvl => 32-20=12 vs 1d20 => 40% you get 70% dispelled.

I know it was suggested to lower the amount of enemies that use dispel magic (It was done and it helped a bit, also f. e. Summoned creatures still dispell like Vampires in the Crypt in the FOD), but even if there are some they will get you sooner or later. Also It would be a lot of work to change all the area spawns.

If possible I would suggest two ways to make it at least playable for hybrid chars.

1. Lower the cap to lesser/normal/greater +5/+10/+15 or better +0/+5/10

2. Also okay would be if Dispel magic and greater dispel magic only dispel one spell each time and not all your spells. It does already if used as an area spell.

For a fairer pvp enviroment, means not only mages can dispell with breach and disjunction, I would sell or add to the loot table wands or better a slot item like a helmet or a cloak of mordekains 1 use per day and breaches 1 use per day. Magic users wouldn't be so overpowered anymore, but still powerfull enough if well played.

Since I play D&D I always was a fan of multiclass characters like Fighter/Magic-user/Rogue or Cleric/Ranger. But with the actual state of how dispel magic works, most players won't play them as it is a nightmare for hybrids.

Have fun all.

Kind regards

Touri
NegInfinity
Posts: 2449
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 11:24 am

Re: Dispel vs Caster Level

Unread post by NegInfinity »

Actually, if people are concerned with CLs of UMD, the better idea would be to allow making wands at specific CL, at higher price of course.

The cost of wand is CasterLevel * SpellLevel * 750 gp.

For example, Level 30 mirror image wand:
30 * 2 * 750 = 45000 gp.

And of course only CL30 mage will be able to make those.
chad878262
Posts: 9332
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 6:55 pm

Re: Dispel vs Caster Level

Unread post by chad878262 »

Touri wrote:Hello all,

it is okay that dispel magic now works as it should, means versus the caster lvl. Unfortunatly by the amount of enemy that uses it, hybrid class characters get dispelled all the time. I think it is no problem if your umd spells or potions get dispelled. But with 15cleric/12fighter/3rogue ((remember a Pala or Ranger normaly has lvl/2 = casterlvl, max caster LVL would be 15))a greater dispel magic with 1w20 +20 will dispel you easily. DC is 11+15= 26 =>26-20=6 vs 1d20 => You get dispelled 70%. 55% by a lvl3 dispel.

You only can buy the cloak of spell ressistance 32 to lower it a bit.
1d20 + 20 Caster lvl => 32-20=12 vs 1d20 => 40% you get 70% dispelled.

I know it was suggested to lower the amount of enemies that use dispel magic (It was done and it helped a bit, also f. e. Summoned creatures still dispell like Vampires in the Crypt in the FOD), but even if there are some they will get you sooner or later. Also It would be a lot of work to change all the area spawns.

If possible I would suggest two ways to make it at least playable for hybrid chars.

1. Lower the cap to lesser/normal/greater +5/+10/+15 or better +0/+5/10

2. Also okay would be if Dispel magic and greater dispel magic only dispel one spell each time and not all your spells. It does already if used as an area spell.

For a fairer pvp enviroment, means not only mages can dispell with breach and disjunction, I would sell or add to the loot table wands or better a slot item like a helmet or a cloak of mordekains 1 use per day and breaches 1 use per day. Magic users wouldn't be so overpowered anymore, but still powerfull enough if well played.

Since I play D&D I always was a fan of multiclass characters like Fighter/Magic-user/Rogue or Cleric/Ranger. But with the actual state of how dispel magic works, most players won't play them as it is a nightmare for hybrids.

Have fun all.

Kind regards

Touri
Also a fan of hybrid characters (2nd ed. F/M/T FTW!!!) but lowering the dispel bonus caps just brings us back to the scenario previously discussed where we are empowering arcane/divine gish builds. I do like the idea of crafting higher CL wands/scrolls/potions as that creates additional in game economy between players and empowers UMD. I would also stipulate that higher CL items should require more UMD (so maybe instead of 11 a CL20 wand requires UMD 21 and a CL30 requires 31 for example). This would benefit builds that maximize UMD while not really benefitting those that cross-class UMD to end up at exactly 11 after CHA is considered.
Chord Silverstrings - Bard and OSR Squire / Tarent Nefzen - Arcane Wand Merchant and Master Alchemist / Irrace Arkentlar - Drow Adventurer / Finneaus Du'Veil - Gem Merchant and Executive Officer of SCCE

Tarent's Wands and Elixirs

A Wand Crafter's guide to using wands
User avatar
Theodore01
Recognized Donor
Posts: 2927
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 5:32 pm

Re: Dispel vs Caster Level

Unread post by Theodore01 »

quick question: are warlocks invocations like see invisible or leaps and bounds on the dispel list ?
User avatar
Calodan
Posts: 2032
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:21 pm
Location: Missoula Montana BIG SKY COUNTRY

Re: Dispel vs Caster Level

Unread post by Calodan »

Also a fan of hybrid characters (2nd ed. F/M/T FTW!!!) but lowering the dispel bonus caps just brings us back to the scenario previously discussed where we are empowering arcane/divine gish builds. I do like the idea of crafting higher CL wands/scrolls/potions as that creates additional in game economy between players and empowers UMD. I would also stipulate that higher CL items should require more UMD (so maybe instead of 11 a CL20 wand requires UMD 21 and a CL30 requires 31 for example). This would benefit builds that maximize UMD while not really benefitting those that cross-class UMD to end up at exactly 11 after CHA is considered.
I think we are getting somewhere here.....I think there are two amounts you head for either 11 for wands only or you go up to 20 for all scrolls currently. I would be fine with making it so maxing out UMD is more awarded and can use the higher scrolls or Wands of 30CL or something. ALL FOR IT!!! Long as we can get a take 20 when not in combat on UMD.
Kory Sentinel
"We should take the army head on!"

"... it sounds like a terrible idea, but look at that smile."
"And he just sounds so confident ... he is a favored soul."
"Even if we don't survive, he will, and isn't that what matters?" -Red Lancer
User avatar
Kauaiian
Recognized Donor
Posts: 337
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 5:59 am
Location: Europe

Re: Dispel vs Caster Level

Unread post by Kauaiian »

chad878262 wrote:
Touri wrote:Hello all,

it is okay that dispel magic now works as it should, means versus the caster lvl. Unfortunatly by the amount of enemy that uses it, hybrid class characters get dispelled all the time. I think it is no problem if your umd spells or potions get dispelled. But with 15cleric/12fighter/3rogue ((remember a Pala or Ranger normaly has lvl/2 = casterlvl, max caster LVL would be 15))a greater dispel magic with 1w20 +20 will dispel you easily. DC is 11+15= 26 =>26-20=6 vs 1d20 => You get dispelled 70%. 55% by a lvl3 dispel.

You only can buy the cloak of spell ressistance 32 to lower it a bit.
1d20 + 20 Caster lvl => 32-20=12 vs 1d20 => 40% you get 70% dispelled.

I know it was suggested to lower the amount of enemies that use dispel magic (It was done and it helped a bit, also f. e. Summoned creatures still dispell like Vampires in the Crypt in the FOD), but even if there are some they will get you sooner or later. Also It would be a lot of work to change all the area spawns.

If possible I would suggest two ways to make it at least playable for hybrid chars.

1. Lower the cap to lesser/normal/greater +5/+10/+15 or better +0/+5/10

2. Also okay would be if Dispel magic and greater dispel magic only dispel one spell each time and not all your spells. It does already if used as an area spell.

For a fairer pvp enviroment, means not only mages can dispell with breach and disjunction, I would sell or add to the loot table wands or better a slot item like a helmet or a cloak of mordekains 1 use per day and breaches 1 use per day. Magic users wouldn't be so overpowered anymore, but still powerfull enough if well played.

Since I play D&D I always was a fan of multiclass characters like Fighter/Magic-user/Rogue or Cleric/Ranger. But with the actual state of how dispel magic works, most players won't play them as it is a nightmare for hybrids.

Have fun all.

Kind regards

Touri
Also a fan of hybrid characters (2nd ed. F/M/T FTW!!!) but lowering the dispel bonus caps just brings us back to the scenario previously discussed where we are empowering arcane/divine gish builds. I do like the idea of crafting higher CL wands/scrolls/potions as that creates additional in game economy between players and empowers UMD. I would also stipulate that higher CL items should require more UMD (so maybe instead of 11 a CL20 wand requires UMD 21 and a CL30 requires 31 for example). This would benefit builds that maximize UMD while not really benefitting those that cross-class UMD to end up at exactly 11 after CHA is considered.
Neg's idea is great!
User avatar
Darkcloud777
Posts: 891
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: Dispel vs Caster Level

Unread post by Darkcloud777 »

I have lots of fun with my cl 28 AT. she ocaasionally gets dispelled but not often. When that happens I have backup wands.
Terri Lalani
Administrator of Phoenix Company
Seymor
Posts: 268
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm

Re: Dispel vs Caster Level

Unread post by Seymor »

How are all of these supposed characters with low CL but HiPS getting dispelled? If you see an enemy cast dispel magic, can't you disengage and HiPS?
Kestral Fyle -- Wizard, Seeker of Candlekeep
Robin Silver -- Illusionist, Cleric of Mielikki [Character Sheet] -- I rose, I roared.
chad878262
Posts: 9332
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 6:55 pm

Re: Dispel vs Caster Level

Unread post by chad878262 »

Seymor wrote:How are all of these supposed characters with low CL but HiPS getting dispelled? If you see an enemy cast dispel magic, can't you disengage and HiPS?
Probably a scenario where they are already hiding, cast a spell which takes them out of hide mode, then get dispelled before the timer resets. However, IMO this is a case of not being cautious about your surroundings and picking targets carefully (which I suppose is good RP if WIS is your dump stat! :P )
Chord Silverstrings - Bard and OSR Squire / Tarent Nefzen - Arcane Wand Merchant and Master Alchemist / Irrace Arkentlar - Drow Adventurer / Finneaus Du'Veil - Gem Merchant and Executive Officer of SCCE

Tarent's Wands and Elixirs

A Wand Crafter's guide to using wands
User avatar
matelener
Retired Staff
Posts: 973
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:02 am

Re: Dispel vs Caster Level

Unread post by matelener »

If you're hipsing against bosses then they will often dispel you in the next round when you're out of the hiding. (Unless you time it so perfectly that they waste the dispel without the spell effect, which is rare)

Of course hipsing a dispel gives you a good indication when to prepare yourself to counterspell the boss. (Once counterspell is fixed)
User avatar
NeonAvenger
Posts: 432
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2015 8:37 am

Re: Dispel vs Caster Level

Unread post by NeonAvenger »

chad878262 wrote: ... I do like the idea of crafting higher CL wands/scrolls/potions as that creates additional in game economy between players and empowers UMD ...
The following is a shameless promotion for Thunderkeg Supplies
Just mentioning it since no-one else has. CL 30 potions are already available in game in the form of elixirs from Master Alchemists. The prices end up a little... extreme and there is at least one spell that has a level cap but they're there.
Maddy Thunderkeg - Capitalism Ho!
William of Ayleford - Every paladin is just a fighter that sat on a stick
NegInfinity
Posts: 2449
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 11:24 am

Re: Dispel vs Caster Level

Unread post by NegInfinity »

Seymor wrote:How are all of these supposed characters with low CL but HiPS getting dispelled? If you see an enemy cast dispel magic, can't you disengage and HiPS?
Unshelved my non-epic AT yesterday, plays fine as before, although killing things by running away from them eventually gets old, and said char definitely works much better as support or spy.

If CL is concern, I'd suggest to implement wands with custom CL. It'll be one heck of a money sink (cl 30 level 9 spell wand == 202500 gp), and will make better wizard crafters possible.

Potions are usable too, although wands would be a much better option
Post Reply

Return to “Solved Problems”