Baldur's Gate : The Sword Coast Chronicles : NWN2 Persistent World

undeath domain is great for morninglords if they could take it... saves a feat...

dzidek1983 wrote:undeath domain is great for morninglords if they could take it... saves a feat...

Let's rename Morninglords as dawnlords then if a morninglord takes this domain

yes lets forget that lathander and kelemvor both hate undeath and would never own that domain....

yes.. thank Gods Lathander has Sun Domain which is so cool...

for an undead hunter it is

exceptional turning, improved turning and empowered turning all for free? yea... my cleric only has a 18 CHA buffed and can effect over 60HD of undead at level 30 (thats three vault of the dead skeletons with one rebuke, or two skeletons and a rev)

so yea id said its good

and she can do it 19 times a day, double awesome i rarely actually run short of turns

BlueHero45 wrote:Because its against server rules to have a cleric with a domain other then the clerics gods.

As for Shargaas it does state he is the orc god of the undead, as such i would not have a problem with him having the undead domain

So you have a problem with giving one god a domain he doesn't have but should, but you don't have any problem with doing the same to some other god? that makes perfect sense yeah..

badmofo wrote:

BlueHero45 wrote:Because its against server rules to have a cleric with a domain other then the clerics gods.

As for Shargaas it does state he is the orc god of the undead, as such i would not have a problem with him having the undead domain

So you have a problem with giving one god a domain he doesn't have but should, but you don't have any problem with doing the same to some other god? that makes perfect sense yeah..

Its a matter of how much your willing to compromise. And myrkul should not have the undead domain as he kills things not brings them back. Shargaas mentions that hes a god of undead, so yes it makes perfect sense.

myrkul doesn't kill things. bhaal does that, myrkul then rules over the dead, i've said it already. and myrkul uses undead.

badmofo wrote:myrkul doesn't kill things. bhaal does that, myrkul then rules over the dead, i've said it already. and myrkul uses undead.

But hes not the god of undead, but the dead

Well he could have Undeath as a domain without stretching things too far.

Laenor wrote:Well he could have Undeath as a domain without stretching things too far.

Yes, its not that far a stretch, id want Myrkul's Pestilence domain though

BlueHero45 wrote:

Laenor wrote:Well he could have Undeath as a domain without stretching things too far.

Yes, its not that far a stretch, id want Myrkul's Pestilence domain though

finally you see the wisdom in it

badmofo wrote:

BlueHero45 wrote:

Laenor wrote:Well he could have Undeath as a domain without stretching things too far.

Yes, its not that far a stretch, id want Myrkul's Pestilence domain though

finally you see the wisdom in it

Well if you want to that way about it, we can simply go by the server rules that don't allow you to pick the undeath domain.

Using undead isn't the same as being the god of the undead. Myrkul doesn't have that portfolio.

BlueHero45 wrote:Well if you want to that way about it, we can simply go by the server rules that don't allow you to pick the undeath domain.

what way? you said it yourself that your willing to bend the rules in one instance so why not in another?