Page 2 of 2

Re: STR-based Ranger, comments?

Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:34 am
by chad878262
Awesome! Also agree camouflage is needed to make the prc "whole"

Thanks Rasael!

Re: STR-based Ranger, comments?

Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2015 4:51 am
by AlfarinIcebreaker
Yup. Without Camouflage it is still not good.

Re: STR-based Ranger, comments?

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 6:30 am
by maseoo
So the last part is trying to decide for a level 18 feat.
The character will have 40 AC with +3 items and 30 ranks in Tumble, 43 AC with Combat expertise on. (Another +1 AC is added when the extra bonus from Protective Ward kicks in the epics).

I'm going with 3 levels Cavestalker, but thinking about which feat to take at level 18:

- Improved combat expertise (gimps AB further but perhaps needed to raise max AC to 46?)
- Extend spell (most level 3 and 4 spells seem less useful, so might be good to extend level 1 and 2 spells...)
- The feat which improves companion level by 3 (3 levels are lost from Cavestalker)
- Knockdown (could be useful for STR-based ranger)

Re: STR-based Ranger, comments?

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 6:43 am
by mrm3ntalist
maseoo wrote:So the last part is trying to decide for a level 18 feat.
The character will have 40 AC with +3 items and 30 ranks in Tumble, 43 AC with Combat expertise on. (Another +1 AC is added when the extra bonus from Protective Ward kicks in the epics).

I'm going with 3 levels Cavestalker, but thinking about which feat to take at level 18:

- Improved combat expertise (gimps AB further but perhaps needed to raise max AC to 46?)
- Extend spell (most level 3 and 4 spells seem less useful, so might be good to extend level 1 and 2 spells...)
- The feat which improves companion level by 3 (3 levels are lost from Cavestalker)
- Knockdown (could be useful for STR-based ranger)
Extend spell