Page 2 of 2

Re: TWF Adventurer Build Critique Wanted!

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 9:02 pm
by Thorsson
chad878262 wrote:15 DEX is enough for TWD
But not for ITWD and I can't see the point of going just for the lower form. There are better ways to increase AC.

Re: TWF Adventurer Build Critique Wanted!

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 9:21 pm
by chad878262
TWD/ITWD is +2 AC... With 6 Ranger levels taking Protective Ward and TWD is +2 AC...what's the difference?

Re: TWF Adventurer Build Critique Wanted!

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 4:42 am
by Thorsson
chad878262 wrote:TWD/ITWD is +2 AC... With 6 Ranger levels taking Protective Ward and TWD is +2 AC...what's the difference?
But LoH and Protective Ward is better still. I'd go for all 4 myself.

Re: TWF Adventurer Build Critique Wanted!

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:08 am
by chad878262
Thorsson wrote:
chad878262 wrote:TWD/ITWD is +2 AC... With 6 Ranger levels taking Protective Ward and TWD is +2 AC...what's the difference?
But LoH and Protective Ward is better still. I'd go for all 4 myself.
But in the context of this build he can't afford them... I was specifically commenting on the fact that his build does not have Protective Ward, so subbing it in for GTWD ends up with the same AC while saving the points spent on DEX.

Re: TWF Adventurer Build Critique Wanted!

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:36 am
by Thorsson
chad878262 wrote:
Thorsson wrote:
chad878262 wrote:TWD/ITWD is +2 AC... With 6 Ranger levels taking Protective Ward and TWD is +2 AC...what's the difference?
But LoH and Protective Ward is better still. I'd go for all 4 myself.
But in the context of this build he can't afford them... I was specifically commenting on the fact that his build does not have Protective Ward, so subbing it in for GTWD ends up with the same AC while saving the points spent on DEX.
He could wield different weapons and save a feat with OTWF.

Expose Weakness is another good reason for keeping that Dex number up.