Should we lessen restrictions on the Underdark? [Poll]

For Issues, Ideas, or Subjects That Do Not Fit Elsewhere

Moderators: Moderator, DM

Should we loosen restrictions on the underdark?

Poll ended at Thu Aug 26, 2021 8:31 pm

Yes.
95
61%
No.
60
39%
 
Total votes: 155

JIŘÍ
Posts: 269
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2019 5:28 pm

Re: Should we lessen restrictions on the Underdark? [Poll]

Unread post by JIŘÍ »

YYA wrote: Thu Aug 12, 2021 11:21 am And anyhow, a thought popped up in my head about all of this. Since I brought up those Menzoberranzan Lolthites, I have to admit that this server does not exactly offer fertile grounds for that kind of Underdark role-play. At the time of the split between Surface and the Underdark, a majority of players tended to be arcanists of one kind or another, who upon had the great freedom to just Mord/Bigby Six any uppity priestess of Lolth. It played a role why the city of S'shamath was eventually created on this server, because in a sense, the Drow players were already rather upset that their characters would be split away from the rest of the server, and instead of the freedom to decide their charatcer fates, they would be more less stuck to saying things like: 'Yes ilharess' -- to every single level one cleric of Lolth that happened to log in. Thus if these players wanted their characters to achieve something, they would have to either roll a priestess of Lolth of their own, which in turn brings us to the pecking order among the priestesses of Lolth... Either it is based on "Cleric v. Cleric" PvP, or simply favour with the Dungeon Masters, and the longevity of any character tends to garner Dungeon Master favour in quantities that is not easily overcome or bested. Not to mention how Menzoberranzan Lolthite role-play tends to manifest servers where you have something like ten clerics of Lolth for every character that is not, and it is simply because the 'servile' role-play tends to grow old rather fast. Not to mention that even if you use your cunning to become an unseen puppet master -- the moment a particular cleric character no longer logs in, well, you kind of lost a large portion of your influence in a female dominated Lolth worshipping drow city. Thus, when I consider the actual player characters of time, the creation of the S'shamath was really the best choice that could have done. Sure, it is a Wizard dominated mercantile city, but at least your character doesn't have to wear high heels and thongs while cracking a whip, and the mercantile nature of the city tends to give role-playing avenues for all kinds of other characters. But even with all that said, the Underdark players who want that Menzoberranzzan Lolthite role-play seem to really loath the city of S'shamath, because it is not the city they would prefer to have. Thus, when it comes to the topic of access to the surface, it is seen as an opportunity to practice the evil deeds of a Menzoberranzan Lolthite -- those chaotic evil deeds to please their goddess and to earn her favour. And that in turn will create the same old PvP issues, because no matter how many of offensive spells you cast on the streets of Beregost, you still have not achieved anything unless you have a Dungeon Master to control the NPCs... Which means that without constant Dungeon Master support, a group of Menzoberranzan Lolthites can only really attack players who mostly sit by the countless campfires. No matter what the hour of the day is, there is always someone there. Now, if you consider how some players might consider their characters as a direct extension of their own person, these players will soon complain about the PvP even if they happen to win it. Which, springs to mind one Half-Elf Warrior of Darkness of mine that happened to be a secret worshipper Bhaal. The worship of Bhaal requires murders committed in the name of Bhaal, you can check that up. Thus at one point, I actually ended up finding a way into the Upperdark, and I did run around utterly lost down there for few hours, and when I finally managed to backtrack to wherever I had come from, (I was no where near to finding Rockrun or S'shamath), I encountered a grinding party of some kind. Some gnome warlock on the left side, some woman on the middle, and the third left no impression whatsoever. My own character was down to 1/3rd or 2/3rd of his hitpoints, and this party spread out to block passage through without provoking attacks of opportunity. As a Bhaal supporter, my character was not the nicest guy to begin with, who then encounters three strangers in a dungeon after being lost in the 'Underdark' for who knows how long -- the three perform mindless greetings, I emote hostility -- the warlock decides to start spamming invocations -- and so I have my character attack the woman in the middle. My charatcer quickly loses to the fully buffed up party, as I had expected, and before I can toss them a Mithral armor as prize of their victory (had found it along the way, no use for myself), the player of that female character starts complaining and continues to complain and begins to demand OOC information about my character over tells for about 30 or so minutes until I just logged off. Come next reset, I used the borked up disguise tool to bug out my character's name, and changed the deity of that character into something else. As for the Mithral armor, either sold at a mistakenly low price in the consignment store, or just left into a campfire. I do not know who those three were and I do not care to know, but I would wager that the more Drow characters are on the surface, the more interactions like that will play out. Either some Paladin attacks Eilistraeean Moon Nudists, or some Menzoberranzan Lolcow goes to Hilltop Ruins to PvP under level tens.


And now I look at that wall of text, and roll even my own eyes. Anyhow, the kill on sight rules do not prevent your character from going to the surface in order to role-play. If you want to do something hostile, send a tell asking first, and people can usually work something out.


Oh, and I have nothing against some Surface grinding areas for the UD characters, some village with a quest to set houses on fire for 200 experience, and villagers to slay. As for some higher level area, maybe some castle guarded by human warriors to attack? But a grinding area like that would be quite evil indeed... So nothing like it will be added to the server, so Underdark players must request for a Dungeon Master support for such an events -- and hosting such events is not necessarily what a dungeon master wants to do.
This is such off rant that i did not even need to finish to the end.

Eilistraeen begging? Llothites playing only to do evil deeds on surface?

Funny. Most eilsitraeen characters that i have ever met across servers either openly and valiantly fought evil brethen or schemed behind ruining evil plots over and over. None that i knew ever begged surfacers for help. Quite contrary, saving captured elves, carrying off dead elven bodies, saving adventurers in UD.

My friend who began here along me with his good drow, elsewhere locked a priestess in a celll when interrogating black archer and shot her and her bodyguards trough bars dead. He kept being pvped by elves and despite that he kept joining random elves and fighting on their side to fend off or kill evil UD PCs attacking them. Neither his or my characters never begged anyone. So before you begin to smear some part of characters, stop if you know nothing what given role contains.

Of course where is no interaction there is no room to play your role. If no drow does evil plots that can be stopped or opposed, if there are no raids, no captives to save, if there are no adventurers to guide or rescue because adventuring in UD gives nothing, then your role of eilistraeen is empty, pointless and no fun.

And if you think playing a llothite means to wear thongs and heels, i do not think you should comment on llothite role play either, because what you wrote is outright disrespect to most players playing a llothite.
Discord contact: Haf#6089
User avatar
YYA
Posts: 380
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 8:52 am

Re: Should we lessen restrictions on the Underdark? [Poll]

Unread post by YYA »

JIŘÍ wrote: Fri Aug 13, 2021 1:20 pmThis is such off rant that i did not even need to finish to the end.
If you think the above was a rant, either an example of bombastic extravagant speech, or an attempt at vehement scolding... Well, I suppose this is one of those moments where a Hollywood depiction of a lawyer would simply smugly conclude how they rest their case.

If you would wish to reread with more accurate mental representation, imagine a guy at a pub, pint of beer, a smoke in his hand, talking about some stuff while his other eye keeps watch on the match on the corner telly.

I could just leave it there, but being the mischievous little scamp that I am...
JIŘÍ wrote: Fri Aug 13, 2021 1:20 pmEilistraeen begging?
I did not know that it was common for worshipers of Eilistraee to conquer and enslave villages, towns, and cities that wished to have nothing to do with the Drow. Well, clearly I was terribly mistaken to consider her the patroness and protector of the few dark elves who longed to return to the surface and live there, at peace with other races, and to abandon the endless conflicts and intrigues that dominated the lives of most drow.

And yeah, the worshippers of Eilistraee on surface would either flee, or attempt to beg for that chance to be heard. This is Forgotten Realms, not Warhammer 40K where the Elder consider killing everyone in their way as a valid form of friendly diplomacy.
JIŘÍ wrote: Fri Aug 13, 2021 1:20 pmLlothites playing only to do evil deeds on surface?
Well, do tell me more of the good deeds these followers of Lolth would wish to perform on the surface. You know, the goddess who thinks that her 'children' should forever stay in the Underdark slaughtering each other for her sole amusement and favour? For a follower of Lolth, the surface is an enemy, so once again, what good deeds would followers of Lolth wish to enact on the surface? Donate to the nearest charity for orphan children, or perhaps rescue a cat from a tree? In my ears, it sounds like your local priestess of 'Lolth' has been subverted into the faith of Vhaeraun. :lol:
JIŘÍ wrote: Fri Aug 13, 2021 1:20 pmAnd if you think playing a llothite means to wear thongs and heels, i do not think you should comment on llothite role play either, because what you wrote is outright disrespect to most players playing a llothite.
Well, yes, how silly of me to forget how the priestesses of Lolth are best known for their attires that most resemble that of Catholic nuns.

Well, since I have had my fun, I'll try to be more serious with the rest:
JIŘÍ wrote: Fri Aug 13, 2021 1:20 pm Funny. Most eilsitraeen characters that i have ever met across servers either openly and valiantly fought evil brethen or schemed behind ruining evil plots over and over. None that i knew ever begged surfacers for help. Quite contrary, saving captured elves, carrying off dead elven bodies, saving adventurers in UD.

My friend who began here along me with his good drow, elsewhere locked a priestess in a celll when interrogating black archer and shot her and her bodyguards trough bars dead. He kept being pvped by elves and despite that he kept joining random elves and fighting on their side to fend off or kill evil UD PCs attacking them. Neither his or my characters never begged anyone. So before you begin to smear some part of characters, stop if you know nothing what given role contains.

Of course where is no interaction there is no room to play your role. If no drow does evil plots that can be stopped or opposed, if there are no raids, no captives to save, if there are no adventurers to guide or rescue because adventuring in UD gives nothing, then your role of eilistraeen is empty, pointless and no fun.
And you know what, all of the above sounds very familiar, because I do recall how a considerable portion of surface elf players complained about these 'friendly drow' ruining their entire immersion. Especially for the ones that played followers of Shevarash. Not to mention that since the drow are not exactly known for their ability to co-operate even against mutual threats... And if we are entirely honest: when a drow kills another drow, it does not make that drow 'a good drow' in the eyes of the other elves, it is merely proof that drow has yet again killed yet another drow. As for the rescue of captives, well, it could be just a drow plot and scheme for the 'released captive' to lead a drow raiding party to its next target. Followers of Eilistraee will probably find better results if they attempt to beg for that small mercy of being even heard.

Oh, and just to make sure, when it comes to most of this server-wide PvP conflicts -- I have actually remained more or less impartial, as it has allowed me to call people on both sides as silly gooses, or complete and utter idiots. <:D
If you are offended by what I said have said above, I have recieved my last warning, I have discussed Intuitive Attack, so report - for I do not mind. Getting me banned is nothing special, it happens every week. But you could also choose not to be offended, this place needs more banter, your choice.
User avatar
Planehopper
Posts: 2298
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 4:50 pm

Re: Should we lessen restrictions on the Underdark? [Poll]

Unread post by Planehopper »

Just a reminder to keep this on topic and relevant to the poll. State your opinion so that we have a wide range of perspectives - and then move along. No need to argue back and forth or flame one another.

Those that ignore this will be followed up individually. Thanks.
edmaster
Posts: 77
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2017 2:58 pm

Re: Should we lessen restrictions on the Underdark? [Poll]

Unread post by edmaster »

16 pages, whew, I think this poll has run its course and did what it had to! Gauge Community interest in a less restricted underdark
JIŘÍ
Posts: 269
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2019 5:28 pm

Re: Should we lessen restrictions on the Underdark? [Poll]

Unread post by JIŘÍ »

YYA wrote: Fri Aug 13, 2021 2:44 pm .... Lots of childish gibbering... Seriously how old are you? It feels like 14 years old.
That nonsense I can barely read.

You know nothing of drow role play and what it contains. And I am not going to educate you on that matter.

As for your anecdotal story. Ruined their immersion? Lol. Perhaps they shouldn't force their limited view on other people in first place?

I run eili group elsewhere and we encountered black archers regularly and despite it being very hostile encounters those players always provided high quality role play. Never would even resort to just draw bow and start shooting on sight.

And as much you provide anecdotes then belive it or Jo first thing you hear when starting a drow here as a new player are same anedoctical stories how elven players are just griefers and bullies.
Discord contact: Haf#6089
JIŘÍ
Posts: 269
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2019 5:28 pm

Re: Should we lessen restrictions on the Underdark? [Poll]

Unread post by JIŘÍ »

These stories how someone ruined fun or immersion for anyone are prime example how shortsighted people play in community who instead of trying to provide fun for both parties involved and seek way how to promote mutual pc interaction just push their own "true and right" narrative not caring for others.
Discord contact: Haf#6089
User avatar
Tsidkenu
Posts: 3962
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 12:04 am
Location: Terra Nullis

Re: Should we lessen restrictions on the Underdark? [Poll]

Unread post by Tsidkenu »

As a former UD and surface player, I am 100% in support of the relaxing of RP reasons required for UD characters to roam the surface northern region, near the exit of the upperdark. This would greatly promote RP possibilities for those usually lonely folk who dare to brave the RP of the world beneath, without requiring the sometimes onerous task of acquiring DM permissions for this or that. Retain KoS rules.

If drow players become a pvp problem, then why can't surfacers organise RP hunting parties with the elvish players and have some old fashioned black devil skirmishes?

I wonder, too, if area bans could be implemented for losing parties? E.g. if a drow player is hunting in surface areas (pvp or otherwise) and dies there, they get a virtual token which bans them from transitioning to any surface area above the upperdark for a minimum of 1 week. This timer doubles or accumulates each subsequent death on the 'wrong' side: 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 4 months, 8 months, up to a surface permaban. Vice versa for surface players capping themselves in the UD. This way DMs don't need to get involved, and there is a risk-reward dynamic enforced on everyone equally. Not sure if that would be possible to script, or how hard such scripting might be. I can't imagine it would be too hard since surface/upperdark/underdark marked areas already exist, and various virutal tokens can be applied to a character which teleports them away automatically from a banned area until the ban duration lifts.
User avatar
Steve
Recognized Donor
Posts: 8127
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 5:42 am
Location: Paradise in GMT +1

Re: Should we lessen restrictions on the Underdark? [Poll]

Unread post by Steve »

Tsidkenu wrote: Sun Aug 15, 2021 4:56 am ...the relaxing of RP reasons required for UD characters to roam the surface northern region,
But the OP didn't state the above, actually.

SummerBreeze wrote:

Subject: Should we lessen restrictions on the Underdark? [Poll]
DM SummerBreeze wrote: Thu Jul 29, 2021 8:31 pm Opening some of the northern maps ( Soubar/Boarskyr/Blackrose area.) as "neutral" territory, where the Kill on Sight rule does not apply ( Normal PVP rules apply.) and expanding/changing the map around Boarskyr slightly.
Neutral territory. No KoS. Which means that Surfacers with every right & reason in Canon Lore to immediately and decidedly kill-that-Drow-before-it-multiplies, is OOC constrained, just so that some Players who are not getting equal attention in the "other half" of the Server's Realm, can...get attention?

If anything, really, just make the Upperdark—WHICH IS WHAT IT WAS DESIGNED AND IMPLENTED FOR@!@!@!@—be that "neutral" territory, and not "force" the Surface to OOC cater to a race of Evil (except a few...which are just gonna have to rough it while dancing in the moonlight).

Talsorian the Conjuransmuter - The (someTIMEs) Traveler

The half-MAN, the MYrchanT(H), the LEGENDermaine ~ Jon Smythe [Bio]

Brinn Essebrenanath — Volamtar, seeking wisdom within the earth dream [Bio]
User avatar
Shadowspinner70
Posts: 381
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2018 5:04 pm

Re: Should we lessen restrictions on the Underdark? [Poll]

Unread post by Shadowspinner70 »

I will argue that, Steve, that the Underdark is "forced" to cater to the surface with the Upperdark. It's a hotly contested territory that by no means would be neutral on top of it being home to some of the most infamous drow cities.

Despite that, I've watched surfacers traverse and grind the areas with impunity, killing the Lolthites' sacred creatures in front of them (why the Lolthites were there at all is anyone's guess), even going so far as to taunt its inhabitants. Said surfacers sometimes go to S'shamath, where they have a clear shot from the Upperdark to the city without fear, and continue to act with impunity despite the fact that only drow can be citizens and it is illegal to insult a citizen.

Then we're the jerkwads who report the incident to the S'shamathian guard, who would be all too glad to punish some surfacers and get some extra pay (a bribe) on the side.

Tbh, I think it's only fair, as much as I wouldn't mind all of the surface being considered the surface and ALL of the Underdark being considered as such, and all of the rules apply there. Then you and I, Steve, can have the fight of the ages.

On a similar note...
PMs are about to be sent.
Avintae - Sugar Addict
Flora - Witchy Woman
Azariah - Doombringer

Supermod mode, activated. The rest is just my opinion.
User avatar
Steve
Recognized Donor
Posts: 8127
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 5:42 am
Location: Paradise in GMT +1

Re: Should we lessen restrictions on the Underdark? [Poll]

Unread post by Steve »

Oh, I think more realistic hostility based on the Canon foundation of Upperdark, Middledark, Sshamath, Drow wickedness, Surfacer stupidity-for relaxing-at-Glouras-while-Drow-plot-slaughter.

Look, the Server obviously requires some OOC Rules to prevent griefing, whether topside, bottom side, left and right. Rules with the goal to protect players AND to steer the community towards RP over mechanical pwning.

But Rules put in place to make the Setting artificially Safe, seems like a big stretch, and disturbing the setting for some whack artificial means.

The Upperdark was never meant to be a “safe zone” either. It was meant to “host” conflict, in a Zone that was Lore-based to be treacherous and difficult, for both sides. And, neither Middledark or Surface would be there without willful decision, thus no Player could declare “GRIEFING!” because WTF were you doing there with your PC, not understanding the context (both OOC and IC). Remember: ignorance of the Rules is no excuse!

That said, I’m still sticking with my belief that if players of Middledark-born PCs would get the same DM/storyline attention as the Surface gets, those Players would be happy as a newborn spider to stay in the nest.

That is the real issue. Artificially creating a neutral surface zone for Drow isn’t going to make the Underdark better or more attractive, as a gaming experience.

I mean…shouldn’t that be what we all want?

Talsorian the Conjuransmuter - The (someTIMEs) Traveler

The half-MAN, the MYrchanT(H), the LEGENDermaine ~ Jon Smythe [Bio]

Brinn Essebrenanath — Volamtar, seeking wisdom within the earth dream [Bio]
User avatar
Rhifox
Custom Content
Posts: 3964
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 2:34 am

Re: Should we lessen restrictions on the Underdark? [Poll]

Unread post by Rhifox »

Steve wrote: Sun Aug 15, 2021 11:08 amThe Upperdark was never meant to be a “safe zone” either. It was meant to “host” conflict, in a Zone that was Lore-based to be treacherous and difficult, for both sides.
It would need to be global KOS for this to work, instead of no-KOS.
Tarina — The Witch of Darkhold, a dealer in spirits and black magic
User avatar
Steve
Recognized Donor
Posts: 8127
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 5:42 am
Location: Paradise in GMT +1

Re: Should we lessen restrictions on the Underdark? [Poll]

Unread post by Steve »

Rhifox wrote: Sun Aug 15, 2021 11:23 am
Steve wrote: Sun Aug 15, 2021 11:08 amThe Upperdark was never meant to be a “safe zone” either. It was meant to “host” conflict, in a Zone that was Lore-based to be treacherous and difficult, for both sides.
It would need to be global KOS for this to work, instead of no-KOS.
LETS DO THIS!!!

Talsorian the Conjuransmuter - The (someTIMEs) Traveler

The half-MAN, the MYrchanT(H), the LEGENDermaine ~ Jon Smythe [Bio]

Brinn Essebrenanath — Volamtar, seeking wisdom within the earth dream [Bio]
User avatar
Rhifox
Custom Content
Posts: 3964
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 2:34 am

Re: Should we lessen restrictions on the Underdark? [Poll]

Unread post by Rhifox »

Steve wrote: Sun Aug 15, 2021 11:33 am
Rhifox wrote: Sun Aug 15, 2021 11:23 am
Steve wrote: Sun Aug 15, 2021 11:08 amThe Upperdark was never meant to be a “safe zone” either. It was meant to “host” conflict, in a Zone that was Lore-based to be treacherous and difficult, for both sides.
It would need to be global KOS for this to work, instead of no-KOS.
LETS DO THIS!!!
I repeat my preferred plan:

Surface South - Surfacers non-KOS, Underdarkers KOS
Surface North - Global KOS
Upperdark - Global KOS
Underdark - Underdarkers non-KOS, surfacers KOS

And then remove any other rules ('must have RP reason', 'can't loot on other side', etc) and let the risk control who goes where when.
Tarina — The Witch of Darkhold, a dealer in spirits and black magic
User avatar
Steve
Recognized Donor
Posts: 8127
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 5:42 am
Location: Paradise in GMT +1

Re: Should we lessen restrictions on the Underdark? [Poll]

Unread post by Steve »

Make it even simpler:

Middledark: Surface Races are KOS
UPPERDARK: Global KOS
Surface: Underdark Races are KOS

The current Rules of “Must IC RP identification of Race” before entering Hostilities are upheld.

And of course, Planetouched (except Aasimar) and Orcs will be able to freely pass between the Realms (think of it as a perk).

In general, 99% of the Playerbase will pursue RP interactions over “get-the-drop-on-em” play. Which is how it should be. But also, the Rules would support ambushes, etc., if done with due diligence.

Talsorian the Conjuransmuter - The (someTIMEs) Traveler

The half-MAN, the MYrchanT(H), the LEGENDermaine ~ Jon Smythe [Bio]

Brinn Essebrenanath — Volamtar, seeking wisdom within the earth dream [Bio]
User avatar
izzul
Posts: 970
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:12 pm

Re: Should we lessen restrictions on the Underdark? [Poll]

Unread post by izzul »

Steve wrote: Sun Aug 15, 2021 11:58 am Make it even simpler:

Middledark: Surface Races are KOS
UPPERDARK: Global KOS
Surface: Underdark Races are KOS

The current Rules of “Must IC RP identification of Race” before entering Hostilities are upheld.

And of course, Planetouched (except Aasimar) and Orcs will be able to freely pass between the Realms (think of it as a perk).

In general, 99% of the Playerbase will pursue RP interactions over “get-the-drop-on-em” play. Which is how it should be. But also, the Rules would support ambushes, etc., if done with due diligence.
+10, upperdark seems like a nice interior area two worlds can gather
Azzizuleia Tyrielmrande-[Permadeath PC]
Eilondruil Eldanyar-Corellon Larethian[Battle Historian]
Iz Azul-Red Knight[Active]
Krueger-Trader viewtopic.php?f=55&t=56617
Mystera Electra-Mystra[Goat Girl]

"give to yourself, took from others-Integrity and Justice"
Locked

Return to “General Discussion”