Thorsson wrote:Still, my point is that Drow should be rare on the surface, but on BG they are not. It seems realistic that people are a lot more suspicious than they would be in a more canon setting. It's the problem of making Drow a playable race.
It's actually more the problem of linking the surface and underdark to be player traversable. Prior to this development we did not have any big issue with Drow walking the surface (at least after the UD was built ).
Azrak Blackaxe, Dwarven WarriorNyr Doch! Deezgul Silverdelve, Dwarven ChanterThe steel in dwarven spines Fastolph "Sam" Ostgood, Hin BladesmanAs good as his name... really
Thorsson wrote:Still, my point is that Drow should be rare on the surface, but on BG they are not. It seems realistic that people are a lot more suspicious than they would be in a more canon setting. It's the problem of making Drow a playable race.
It's actually more the problem of linking the surface and underdark to be player traversable. Prior to this development we did not have any big issue with Drow walking the surface (at least after the UD was built ).
It also has a lot to do with UD characters able to run Surface Quests. I always see UD characters running in and out of Maltz's store.
Thorsson wrote:Still, my point is that Drow should be rare on the surface, but on BG they are not. It seems realistic that people are a lot more suspicious than they would be in a more canon setting. It's the problem of making Drow a playable race.
It's actually more the problem of linking the surface and underdark to be player traversable. Prior to this development we did not have any big issue with Drow walking the surface (at least after the UD was built ).
It also has a lot to do with UD characters able to run Surface Quests. I always see UD characters running in and out of Maltz's store.
Still!?!?! I've already warned against this! If I catch any UD characters doing Maltz's quest, I'm docking exp and sending the players to a nice place for a proper dressing-down.
A merchant like Maltz isn't going to risk the death penalty, just to do business with a drow. He would even ask fully-helmed customers to doff their helmets, while in his shop.
Sir Justin Crownsilver: "I am a Crownsilver, however least regarded of those who bear that proud name."
If anybody sees a Drow doing the Maltz quest, feel free to get some screenshots and send them to us. We'll send out the Maltz Hit Squad with Level Draining Clubs of Sapping.
Wirg to Pug: "Iz lat dun?"
Pugratix to a snarky militia man: "Mmmm. Not yet. I will live for hundreds of years and be heralded as one of the greatest forces of destruction on the face of the world. The only thing you can destroy is the outhouse."
There is only one unwritten rule you should be aware of at all time and in all places.
You, and I mean everyone. Is personaly responsable, for the individual enjoyment of everyone else you ever meet in game. If you do anything less than your level best to role play your character in an engaging way that does not damage the playing environment for others. I will take steps against you if and when I catch you, and I will.
I am sick and tired of people damanding rules and arguing their "rights.
Here is the simple, bottom line.
If we make rules for eveything, people will expect rules for everything, and eventualy NEED rules for everything.
You do not need rules to know that your behavior effects others, and that if you do not moderate your own behavior, you can expect to be censured.
Hiding behind rules as "Bounds of Abuse" is entirely unacceptable.
Players who feel they must "Win" at everything all the time, and are either unwilling to accept that they are part of a cohesive whole that requires them to accept others role playing on a level playing field, or unable to grasp this simple truth. Will find themselves at logerheads with me.
I will not restate this again.
Players will not get rules to hide behind, police your own behavior, and take responsability for what you do. Be polite, courteous and respect those sharing the playing environment, or be prepared for a much toughter disiciplinary line.
In answer to PM because apparently this is not clear enough.
If, you as a player, meta game, and in so doing, cause harm to the playing environment, I will ban you.
Maltz? Are you sure this has been done recently? I can't imagine that I actually missed Maltz. Guess I'll have to check. NPC quest givers on the surface should not give quests to drow.
Luna wrote:Maybe leaf can do it...
His job is to do what he wants to do to make the PW better...
I really don't know, but I would think that unless it's a specific quest from a person that doesn't mind, then surfacers wouldn't be able to do UD quests
Seril Thickfoot--The only *real* Seril
Ur'Grak -- Your befuddled neighborhood minotaur
Hraligar Shatterstone--Xenophobic dwarf
Thur--'Da smoosha' fo' 'da Bane
Boric Smethel--Insane human warlock
Leaf_Smoker wrote:Maltz? Are you sure this has been done recently? I can't imagine that I actually missed Maltz. Guess I'll have to check. NPC quest givers on the surface should not give quests to drow.
I saw a Deep Gnome do it last week. I can't say I've seen a drow do them, but I've seen the other UD races running around those quest givers.
07paul87 wrote:I really don't know, but I would think that unless it's a specific quest from a person that doesn't mind, then surfacers wouldn't be able to do UD quests
Yes, and that is my fault. After I made it so drow can't do surface quests, I did actually mean to "surface proof" the UD quests. It sort of got back burnered. So much work to catch up on. I guess you all won't be seeing me ingame for a few days while I play catch up.
The problem really arises though where we have a few races that have an option of where to spawn, so I can't really cut some of them off from either. I will have to look for a way to do this. Will probably be sloppy until we cna get the DB in. Please bear with the staff until then.
Luna wrote:Maybe leaf can do it...
His job is to do what he wants to do to make the PW better...