Shrinking the module - removing areas
Moderators: Moderator, Quality Control, Developer, DM
- Zanniej
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:28 am
- Location: The dark parts of the forum
Shrinking the module - removing areas
This topic came up before, so I was wondering if we could perhaps get some sort of consensus on the most redundant areas of the server. Places we could do without, in order to make the module smaller, and enhance the stability.
The first that comes to my mind are the two areas of fugue. We could easily lose one, as it's a pretty OOC area.
Anybody else got good ideas of areas that don't really serve enough purpose, so could be removed?
The first that comes to my mind are the two areas of fugue. We could easily lose one, as it's a pretty OOC area.
Anybody else got good ideas of areas that don't really serve enough purpose, so could be removed?
Off to greener pastures
- Steve
- Recognized Donor
- Posts: 8127
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 5:42 am
- Location: Paradise in GMT +1
Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas
Baldur's Gate? 
EDIT: alright, in all seriousness—maybe sadness as well—if you added up all the BG Areas, then correlated the RP that happens there compared to the RP that happens at the single FAI map, you'd instantly see that Baldur's Gate takes up far too much space for its actual use.
Though I'd love to see that change—and still diligently work towards bringing RP to the Gate—I'm also painfully aware of the truth of the situation: BG the City is boring for Players, and not used enough as backdrop by DMs.
So maybe what is actually needed is some consensus on what Areas need more focus, to become viable (again).
EDIT: alright, in all seriousness—maybe sadness as well—if you added up all the BG Areas, then correlated the RP that happens there compared to the RP that happens at the single FAI map, you'd instantly see that Baldur's Gate takes up far too much space for its actual use.
Though I'd love to see that change—and still diligently work towards bringing RP to the Gate—I'm also painfully aware of the truth of the situation: BG the City is boring for Players, and not used enough as backdrop by DMs.
So maybe what is actually needed is some consensus on what Areas need more focus, to become viable (again).
Talsorian the Conjuransmuter - The (someTIMEs) Traveler
The half-MAN, the MYrchanT(H), the LEGENDermaine ~ Jon Smythe [Bio]
Brinn Essebrenanath — Volamtar, seeking wisdom within the earth dream [Bio]
- Hawke
- Posts: 1245
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 6:11 pm
Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas
I woudn't kill the land mass... but I could definitely see re-utilization of the space there.
There are huge amounts of areas that just have nothing on them. Let's put some quests there or something to fill that space.
There are huge amounts of areas that just have nothing on them. Let's put some quests there or something to fill that space.
If the text is this color, I am on duty, everything else is just my humble opinion.
- Zanniej
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:28 am
- Location: The dark parts of the forum
Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas
I think it better to remove said spaces. Better to have a few less areas with enough to do. The aim here is also to remove some areas, as the amount of areas are one of the causes for reduced stability of the module ( correct me if I'm wrong there ).Hawke wrote:I woudn't kill the land mass... but I could definitely see re-utilization of the space there.
There are huge amounts of areas that just have nothing on them. Let's put some quests there or something to fill that space.
Thus, I'm trying to see what areas people wouldn't miss, so we could perhaps get a bit more stability, allowing everybody to have more fun playing, even when the server is full.
Off to greener pastures
- Kiran
- Posts: 796
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2016 12:21 pm
- Location: United Kingdom
Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas
Get rid of the underdark...?
Player of:
Damian Pascal, - Run away/dead. - Background - Corruption from Within
Amenthes Serb, Knight - Gone missing/Supposed dead Background
Tamzim Renima, mercenary - Handed over to the fist. Background
Kiran, Golden Wheel - Presumed dead
Althalous Fenwick, Paladin of Mystra. - A memory lost
Althalous Fenwick, Paladin of Mystra. - A memory lost
-
=Thunderbolt=
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 11:12 am
- Location: Funland
Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas
Are there how many DM areas in the module these days and are they all truly needed? Said areas are mostly used in events and see little to no use outside of events. You could bring back spesific areas for events if needed and then delete them again. These usually are quite blank areas so the gain might not be that much after all.
*nods*
-
Randall
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 1:19 pm
- Location: Maniwaki
- Contact:
Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas
Personally I kinda liked the fact that the server used to be a road between Baldur's Gate and the lake Weng.
All those new areas added north are confusing to me. But hey, I'm an old person with old habits.
All those new areas added north are confusing to me. But hey, I'm an old person with old habits.
DM Passiflora - Hmm?
Randall Armstrong - Dead.
Randall Armstrong - Dead.
- Aspect of Sorrow
- Custom Content
- Posts: 2634
- Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 7:11 pm
- Location: Reliquary
Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas
One of my tinker projects is introducing existing areas to the live server only when requested/used by a player rather than loaded every time. This was something I was able to successfully merge in and out using NWNX2 Resman in NWN1. In NWN2, I don't have the liberty of removing an area from the live server resource pool, but I shouldn't have trouble with it dynamically being added in just before an AT.
-
Atlas
- Posts: 1289
- Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 2:00 pm
-
-
Last edited by Atlas on Tue Jul 17, 2018 7:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Character Profile and The Battles of Sir Amalric of Germont aka Sir Arkaine Halforken Link:
viewtopic.php?f=153&t=18827&p=836119#p836119
viewtopic.php?f=153&t=18827&p=836119#p836119
- Rhifox
- Custom Content
- Posts: 3964
- Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 2:34 am
Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas
I agree with going with double servers if at all possible.
If not... for redundant areas I can think of is one or both of the road areas between Triel and Uldoon Trail (the ones that have undead peasants and giant snakes wandering around on them). Get rid of at least one, because both areas look exactly the same... bland, flat, empty areas.
If not... for redundant areas I can think of is one or both of the road areas between Triel and Uldoon Trail (the ones that have undead peasants and giant snakes wandering around on them). Get rid of at least one, because both areas look exactly the same... bland, flat, empty areas.
Tarina — The Witch of Darkhold, a dealer in spirits and black magic
- Glowfire
- Posts: 1814
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:14 am
Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas
Its exterior areas that are a problem more so than interior ones.
While the Chionthar river/Uldoon expansion was neat, it has some needless areas. Adding them in gave an idea of longer travelling times but it shouldn't come at cost of server stability. If possible, something might be done so they can be kept as a back route past settlement but that might be luxory at this point.
-Take out all Chionathar maps (add the dungeon to the road between BG and FAI).
-Forest of Wyrms.
-Reaching Woods.
-Triel.
-Road between Triel and Soubar (add the ant burrow elsewhere).
-Road between BG and UB (add the witch to the hill of UB. UB will be accessible by ship only just like Roaringshore).
-Sunset Mountains (the area below DH).
-Area before the white dragon (IIRC there's a very small area before the white dragon that has yetis and elementals. Add the white dragon dungeon to the Cloud Peaks).
-Coast South of Candlekeep (all areas accessed through it can be reached through another point).
-Gullykin (Yes, its a town but what value does it add? Move Kossuth's temple to Greypeaks.)
Also wondering if Rockrun is an exterior map? That map is huge, biggest one in-game perhaps?
While the Chionthar river/Uldoon expansion was neat, it has some needless areas. Adding them in gave an idea of longer travelling times but it shouldn't come at cost of server stability. If possible, something might be done so they can be kept as a back route past settlement but that might be luxory at this point.
-Take out all Chionathar maps (add the dungeon to the road between BG and FAI).
-Forest of Wyrms.
-Reaching Woods.
-Triel.
-Road between Triel and Soubar (add the ant burrow elsewhere).
-Road between BG and UB (add the witch to the hill of UB. UB will be accessible by ship only just like Roaringshore).
-Sunset Mountains (the area below DH).
-Area before the white dragon (IIRC there's a very small area before the white dragon that has yetis and elementals. Add the white dragon dungeon to the Cloud Peaks).
-Coast South of Candlekeep (all areas accessed through it can be reached through another point).
-Gullykin (Yes, its a town but what value does it add? Move Kossuth's temple to Greypeaks.)
Also wondering if Rockrun is an exterior map? That map is huge, biggest one in-game perhaps?
Power is the most persuasive rhetoric.
Friedrich von Schiller
Friedrich von Schiller
- Calodan
- Posts: 2032
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:21 pm
- Location: Missoula Montana BIG SKY COUNTRY
Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas
Double server it. Will donate more. Freshen up areas that are not used and give them dungeons and treasures to go loot. The HIgh Moors comes to mind here. That area is not used hardly ever.
Kory Sentinel
"We should take the army head on!"
"... it sounds like a terrible idea, but look at that smile."
"And he just sounds so confident ... he is a favored soul."
"Even if we don't survive, he will, and isn't that what matters?" -Red Lancer
"We should take the army head on!"
"... it sounds like a terrible idea, but look at that smile."
"And he just sounds so confident ... he is a favored soul."
"Even if we don't survive, he will, and isn't that what matters?" -Red Lancer
- dedude
- Retired Staff
- Posts: 1550
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 11:21 am
Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas
Splitting the server means splitting the areas of the module into two separate modules right? Not having two identical instances of the same module?
- Calodan
- Posts: 2032
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:21 pm
- Location: Missoula Montana BIG SKY COUNTRY
Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas
Exactlydedude wrote:Splitting the server means splitting the areas of the module into two separate modules right? Not having two identical instances of the same module?
Kory Sentinel
"We should take the army head on!"
"... it sounds like a terrible idea, but look at that smile."
"And he just sounds so confident ... he is a favored soul."
"Even if we don't survive, he will, and isn't that what matters?" -Red Lancer
"We should take the army head on!"
"... it sounds like a terrible idea, but look at that smile."
"And he just sounds so confident ... he is a favored soul."
"Even if we don't survive, he will, and isn't that what matters?" -Red Lancer
- Ambaryerno
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 1:32 am
Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas
What about using the overland map, and then cut out a lot of the areas that are primarily filler to pad out travel distances? Minor dungeon areas could instead be entered directly from the map.
Julia "la Belle" - Duelist, singer, and shameless flirt. Currently deciding whether she wants to fight you or @$%& you.
Julia's Songbook
Lucia Kayla - If her parents find out she left the Island she'll likely be grounded until she's 500.
Julia's Songbook
Lucia Kayla - If her parents find out she left the Island she'll likely be grounded until she's 500.