Shrinking the module - removing areas

Suggestions Should Be Posted in Their Respective Categories

Moderators: Moderator, Quality Control, Developer, DM

User avatar
Zanniej
Posts: 2454
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:28 am
Location: The dark parts of the forum

Shrinking the module - removing areas

Unread post by Zanniej »

This topic came up before, so I was wondering if we could perhaps get some sort of consensus on the most redundant areas of the server. Places we could do without, in order to make the module smaller, and enhance the stability.

The first that comes to my mind are the two areas of fugue. We could easily lose one, as it's a pretty OOC area.

Anybody else got good ideas of areas that don't really serve enough purpose, so could be removed?
Off to greener pastures
User avatar
Steve
Recognized Donor
Posts: 8127
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 5:42 am
Location: Paradise in GMT +1

Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas

Unread post by Steve »

Baldur's Gate? :twisted:

EDIT: alright, in all seriousness—maybe sadness as well—if you added up all the BG Areas, then correlated the RP that happens there compared to the RP that happens at the single FAI map, you'd instantly see that Baldur's Gate takes up far too much space for its actual use.

Though I'd love to see that change—and still diligently work towards bringing RP to the Gate—I'm also painfully aware of the truth of the situation: BG the City is boring for Players, and not used enough as backdrop by DMs.

So maybe what is actually needed is some consensus on what Areas need more focus, to become viable (again).

Talsorian the Conjuransmuter - The (someTIMEs) Traveler

The half-MAN, the MYrchanT(H), the LEGENDermaine ~ Jon Smythe [Bio]

Brinn Essebrenanath — Volamtar, seeking wisdom within the earth dream [Bio]
User avatar
Hawke
Posts: 1245
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 6:11 pm

Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas

Unread post by Hawke »

I woudn't kill the land mass... but I could definitely see re-utilization of the space there.

There are huge amounts of areas that just have nothing on them. Let's put some quests there or something to fill that space.
If the text is this color, I am on duty, everything else is just my humble opinion.
User avatar
Zanniej
Posts: 2454
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:28 am
Location: The dark parts of the forum

Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas

Unread post by Zanniej »

Hawke wrote:I woudn't kill the land mass... but I could definitely see re-utilization of the space there.

There are huge amounts of areas that just have nothing on them. Let's put some quests there or something to fill that space.
I think it better to remove said spaces. Better to have a few less areas with enough to do. The aim here is also to remove some areas, as the amount of areas are one of the causes for reduced stability of the module ( correct me if I'm wrong there ).

Thus, I'm trying to see what areas people wouldn't miss, so we could perhaps get a bit more stability, allowing everybody to have more fun playing, even when the server is full.
Off to greener pastures
User avatar
Kiran
Posts: 796
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2016 12:21 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas

Unread post by Kiran »

Get rid of the underdark...?
Player of:

Damian Pascal, - Run away/dead. - Background - Corruption from Within
Amenthes Serb, Knight - Gone missing/Supposed dead Background
Tamzim Renima, mercenary - Handed over to the fist. Background
Kiran, Golden Wheel - Presumed dead
Althalous Fenwick, Paladin of Mystra. - A memory lost
=Thunderbolt=
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 11:12 am
Location: Funland

Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas

Unread post by =Thunderbolt= »

Are there how many DM areas in the module these days and are they all truly needed? Said areas are mostly used in events and see little to no use outside of events. You could bring back spesific areas for events if needed and then delete them again. These usually are quite blank areas so the gain might not be that much after all.
*nods*
Randall
Posts: 363
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 1:19 pm
Location: Maniwaki
Contact:

Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas

Unread post by Randall »

Personally I kinda liked the fact that the server used to be a road between Baldur's Gate and the lake Weng.

All those new areas added north are confusing to me. But hey, I'm an old person with old habits. :lol:
DM Passiflora - Hmm?
Randall Armstrong - Dead.
User avatar
Aspect of Sorrow
Custom Content
Posts: 2634
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 7:11 pm
Location: Reliquary

Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas

Unread post by Aspect of Sorrow »

One of my tinker projects is introducing existing areas to the live server only when requested/used by a player rather than loaded every time. This was something I was able to successfully merge in and out using NWNX2 Resman in NWN1. In NWN2, I don't have the liberty of removing an area from the live server resource pool, but I shouldn't have trouble with it dynamically being added in just before an AT.
Atlas
Posts: 1289
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 2:00 pm

-

Unread post by Atlas »

-
Last edited by Atlas on Tue Jul 17, 2018 7:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Character Profile and The Battles of Sir Amalric of Germont aka Sir Arkaine Halforken Link:
viewtopic.php?f=153&t=18827&p=836119#p836119
User avatar
Rhifox
Custom Content
Posts: 3964
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 2:34 am

Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas

Unread post by Rhifox »

I agree with going with double servers if at all possible.

If not... for redundant areas I can think of is one or both of the road areas between Triel and Uldoon Trail (the ones that have undead peasants and giant snakes wandering around on them). Get rid of at least one, because both areas look exactly the same... bland, flat, empty areas.
Tarina — The Witch of Darkhold, a dealer in spirits and black magic
User avatar
Glowfire
Posts: 1814
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:14 am

Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas

Unread post by Glowfire »

Its exterior areas that are a problem more so than interior ones.

While the Chionthar river/Uldoon expansion was neat, it has some needless areas. Adding them in gave an idea of longer travelling times but it shouldn't come at cost of server stability. If possible, something might be done so they can be kept as a back route past settlement but that might be luxory at this point.

-Take out all Chionathar maps (add the dungeon to the road between BG and FAI).
-Forest of Wyrms.
-Reaching Woods.
-Triel.
-Road between Triel and Soubar (add the ant burrow elsewhere).
-Road between BG and UB (add the witch to the hill of UB. UB will be accessible by ship only just like Roaringshore).
-Sunset Mountains (the area below DH).
-Area before the white dragon (IIRC there's a very small area before the white dragon that has yetis and elementals. Add the white dragon dungeon to the Cloud Peaks).
-Coast South of Candlekeep (all areas accessed through it can be reached through another point).
-Gullykin (Yes, its a town but what value does it add? Move Kossuth's temple to Greypeaks.)


Also wondering if Rockrun is an exterior map? That map is huge, biggest one in-game perhaps?
Power is the most persuasive rhetoric.
Friedrich von Schiller
User avatar
Calodan
Posts: 2032
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:21 pm
Location: Missoula Montana BIG SKY COUNTRY

Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas

Unread post by Calodan »

Double server it. Will donate more. Freshen up areas that are not used and give them dungeons and treasures to go loot. The HIgh Moors comes to mind here. That area is not used hardly ever.
Kory Sentinel
"We should take the army head on!"

"... it sounds like a terrible idea, but look at that smile."
"And he just sounds so confident ... he is a favored soul."
"Even if we don't survive, he will, and isn't that what matters?" -Red Lancer
User avatar
dedude
Retired Staff
Posts: 1550
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 11:21 am

Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas

Unread post by dedude »

Splitting the server means splitting the areas of the module into two separate modules right? Not having two identical instances of the same module?
User avatar
Calodan
Posts: 2032
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:21 pm
Location: Missoula Montana BIG SKY COUNTRY

Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas

Unread post by Calodan »

dedude wrote:Splitting the server means splitting the areas of the module into two separate modules right? Not having two identical instances of the same module?
Exactly
Kory Sentinel
"We should take the army head on!"

"... it sounds like a terrible idea, but look at that smile."
"And he just sounds so confident ... he is a favored soul."
"Even if we don't survive, he will, and isn't that what matters?" -Red Lancer
User avatar
Ambaryerno
Posts: 467
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 1:32 am

Re: Shrinking the module - removing areas

Unread post by Ambaryerno »

What about using the overland map, and then cut out a lot of the areas that are primarily filler to pad out travel distances? Minor dungeon areas could instead be entered directly from the map.
Julia "la Belle" - Duelist, singer, and shameless flirt. Currently deciding whether she wants to fight you or @$%& you.
Julia's Songbook

Lucia Kayla - If her parents find out she left the Island she'll likely be grounded until she's 500.
Post Reply

Return to “Suggestions and Discussion”