And of course, the dreaded 4e Rule Set!!!

Moderators: Moderator, Quality Control, Developer, DM

I agree. There’s quite a big thing going on with the new DM event lately. In fact I’d say there’s a noticeable uptick in DM activity that has been engaging a wide range of players. Things are being “shaken up” about to the extent they can be on a PW lately.JustAnotherGuy wrote: ↑Thu Mar 18, 2021 3:09 pm This is kind of an aside ... but I don't know why people keep saying things like, "We need a shake up" and "nothing is causing change". There's been a LOT going on in the server lately. Perhaps nothing visual is changing, but attitudes, characters, ideals, circumstances, plots. All these things are shaking the world right now.
Now, back on topic, I do feel the ToT needs some representation. I do think that going too long with it would be detrimental. And I do feel that playing it out perfectly to lore would be detrimental. Again, I don't have any good ideas, just what I don't want to see! lol.
What's the difference of "never have happened" and "part of the lore" if you can't interact with either, sit down with in a tavern and share drinks with, go adventure together, perhaps pursue friendship, romance and rivalry - or change from one to another?artemitavik wrote: ↑Thu Mar 18, 2021 1:23 pm Well, the point isn't that the 12 years of the character would "never have happened" sort of thing, these characters would stay part of the lore of the server, clearly.
But this is a great opportunity to address a goodly portion of the balance, power creep, and lore/level issues that pop up on the server now and again. I don't think we should waste the clean slate potential.
And the year time skip was just an example, not a hard "WE MUST DO THIS" declaration or anything.
Using it to springboard a level 20 cap though, is in my mind totally legit "Well, magic don't work that way anymore... or godly powers.. huh... ok, new plan" sort of thing.
It would also encourage prestige classes to be more prestigious and such.
Why, exactly?
This.Steve wrote: ↑Thu Mar 18, 2021 4:53 pm My two cents is that BGTSCC is better served to use the year 1358 DR to diverge from the Canon timeline of the Forgotten Realms, and let the Players and the DMs carve out a new timeline, custom timeline. Why does this sound good to me? Because then, once and for all, we can end the meta knowledge of "how things should be..." in terms of Canon Timeline, and simple invest in storybuilding that reflects both the creativity and investment of the players, the DMs, the community that wish to actually write that story through unfolding RP that is "unhinged" from any pre-scripted chains.
I think the not knowing of the future, in terms of the BTSCC Sword Coast form 1358 DR onward, would be amazing, inspiring, exciting, challenging, etc. Things could change that we love/hate, and the game would be about how we players and DMs can role-play in the present of "all that mess."
I'm not saying lets throw the canon out with the bath water, but also consider that a World in which the future cannot be looked up on a Wiki, sounds rather...expansive and alluring, much more than "let's dot the I's and cross the T's, then move on."

My gun is clean and ready to go! j/kartemitavik wrote: ↑Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:24 pm Ok, so, if everyone wasn't annoyed with me enough for various things, I'm about to get myself likely shot.

What's the point of a character if you can't interact with them?artemitavik wrote: ↑Thu Mar 18, 2021 4:48 pmWhy, exactly?
Also. the difference between "never have happened" and just advancing the timeline again is quite large. If it never happened, then it never happened. If it's just a new generation, yes, interaction with the now-npcs might be limited, but the history is still there, the legacy of what those organizations and people have done on the server is still there, still RPable about, and still have an impact on what future RP may be.
As for why 9th level:artemitavik wrote: ↑Thu Mar 18, 2021 5:33 pm Because at that point, if there is a time jump, it's not a character anymore, it's history. As is, how likely is that anyway? Not very, so stress less.
You didn't answer my question about why.