Some inconsistencies in herbalism that may or may not be oversights:
When clicking a Vrukhweed node you get 2 Vrukhweed instead of 1.
Grapes, Pears, Apples, and Strawberries all seem to use the Survival skill to harvest instead of Agriculture, in spite of them being cultivated food items.
Herbalism Inconsistencies
Moderators: Moderator, Developer, DM
-
Green Monster
- Recognized Donor
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2023 1:10 pm
- DaloLorn
- Posts: 2478
- Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2019 2:44 am
- Contact:
Re: Herbalism Inconsistencies
Vrukhweed should be granting two stackable single-use herbs now. These are a lot lighter on your inventory slots than the unstackable two-charge herbs, while still achieving the same general effect.
Retiree. Ex-fixer of random bits. Discord ghost.
Active characters: ... What did you think "retiree" meant, again?
Active characters: ... What did you think "retiree" meant, again?
-
Green Monster
- Recognized Donor
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2023 1:10 pm
Re: Herbalism Inconsistencies
Nice, thank you. Just making sure that wasn't an error.
Though that does make me hope that some of the herbalism products that currently have charges could instead generate multiple single use items. For example, the Manrake Essence that has 3 charges of Protection from Petrification. Instead of distilling a mandrake root producing one of those with 3 charges, could that recipe instead start producing 3 stackable single use essences? That would help a lot if this feature were implemented on the recipes as well as the Vrukhweed.
- DaloLorn
- Posts: 2478
- Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2019 2:44 am
- Contact:
Re: Herbalism Inconsistencies
That would be my ideal, yes. That said, besides the odd bit of technical support and suggestions, I haven't really been too involved with this project, it's more Ashenie's thing. I'm not 100% sure how the crafting dialogue even works. 
Retiree. Ex-fixer of random bits. Discord ghost.
Active characters: ... What did you think "retiree" meant, again?
Active characters: ... What did you think "retiree" meant, again?