RWoT build advice-

Questions About Character Builds, Build Critiques, and Build Sharing

Moderators: Moderator, DM

User avatar
Rhifox
Custom Content
Posts: 3964
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 2:34 am

Re: RWoT build advice-

Unread post by Rhifox »

JCVD1 wrote:
Rhifox wrote:I would like to know which piece of lore says that Thayans don't like blood magic. When people write up stuff like that they should really source themselves.

If there is a source that indicates they don't like it, then by all means, keep it restricted. But I've not seen such a mention in any RW source I've read, which is a lot.
"server made up lore" is the answer. No real lore attached to it.
Rasael seemed to indicate it was pieced together from sources, in a post he's made:

"The text is drawn from a collection of class background snippets and source books. But apart from that the D&D lore is vague at best and leaves the topic to the DM's imagination."

If the Thayan bits are not inspired by any actual lore, then those should be removed from it, IMO.

There's a lot of stuff done wrong with that prc, honestly. Like the instant evil shift, turning Bloodseeking Spell into a second source of increased CL instead of just an extra 1d6 damage like in pnp, and having half of its feat tax removed (it's supposed to require Great Fortitude too, not just Toughness).
Tarina — The Witch of Darkhold, a dealer in spirits and black magic
User avatar
TheLier
Posts: 388
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 10:07 am

Re: RWoT build advice-

Unread post by TheLier »

GREEN LIGHT!

Now it is legit.


Praised builders: Can you offer a detalied build with it? I would thank you kindly for it.

((mrm3ntalist was right. You are still a dirty elf, phew.)
ctothep
Posts: 484
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2014 7:06 pm

Re: RWoT build advice-

Unread post by ctothep »

I am by far not as experienced as others here but that is what i would do

http://nwn2db.com/build/?241184

Exchange PM for BM

38 CL
33+ spell level Necromancy DCs (42 Wail)
Lots of spell slots
~43 AC with CE
Quicken Spell
Vamp Feast

I think it would be stronger if you go for PM instead of BM though. You do lose quite a bit of CLs but you get so much back from the spellpower feats that all the PM goodies are very much worth it imo

Edit: That build is actually 33+ spell level nec DCs, my bad.
Last edited by ctothep on Tue Apr 26, 2016 12:40 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Characters:

Zaraun - Vhaeraunite Deathsinger, School of Illusions and Phantasm

Retired Characters:

Iston - Lost within the void ... (deceased)
User avatar
TheLier
Posts: 388
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 10:07 am

Re: RWoT build advice-

Unread post by TheLier »

ctothep wrote:I am by far not as experienced as others here but that is what i would do

http://nwn2db.com/build/?241184

Exchange PM for BM

38 CL
35+ spell level Necromancy DCs (44 Wail)
Lots of spell slots
~50 AC with CE
Quicken Spell
Vamp Feast

I think it would be stronger if you go for PM instead of BM though. You do lose quite a bit of CLs but you get so much back from the spellpower feats that all the PM goodies are very much worth it imo
Pm does not fit the rp. He is a necro who focuses on other aspects of the school

Besides: Thanks a lot!
User avatar
Lockonnow
Posts: 3106
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2010 12:10 pm

Re: RWoT build advice-

Unread post by Lockonnow »

TheLier have you see the fire domain for the Claric it give 2 fire spells one is fire ball and the other is fire wall
User avatar
TheLier
Posts: 388
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 10:07 am

Re: RWoT build advice-

Unread post by TheLier »

Lockonnow wrote:TheLier have you see the fire domain for the Claric it give 2 fire spells one is fire ball and the other is fire wall

I do not think that is relevant for DC necro.
User avatar
TheLier
Posts: 388
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 10:07 am

Re: RWoT build advice-

Unread post by TheLier »

Anyone else, full build suggestion, knowing that BM can be used?
Post Reply

Return to “Character Building”