That change the dynamic of a conversation. Especially when things like this:I also want to say that Hoihe is wrong: Druids aren't "specialty priests".
Are in the forgotten realms campaign setting, revised (2nd edition), p. 17.Druids, the most common type of specialty priest, tend to worship outside of standard temple complexes, and instead wander the land, collecting into loosely affiliated circles throughout the Realms
Is the source wrong? Maybe. Is there a conflicting source elsewhere? It wouldnt be a decades-old game if there weren't. It doesn't mean someone is wrong, it means they have looked at the same bunch of stuff we all have and have a different opinion.
I tried as a player to steer this conversation toward fewer absolutes and more possibilities. I offer quotes and references so that others could use them to help formulate their opinions. With multiple circles with multiple leaders it seemed clear to me that there are several options available for druidic RP, and as has been presented here there are several sources that conflict upon themselves, opening the door to interesting and varied beliefs.
As a player, I appreciate varied viewpoints when they are backed up by lore and resources. I think it is important that we all play with the same materials available to read and review, but less important that we all agree on them. If there is ever a rub, a sticking point, it isnt for us as players to decide anyway.