The New Age Rules

For Guidance, Questions, or Concerns Relating to Server Rules and Forum Rules

Moderators: Moderator, Quality Control, Developer, DM

User avatar
blowuup
Posts: 142
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 2:02 am
Location: Las Vegas

Re: The New Age Rules

Unread post by blowuup »

This would be my version of the rule, I think it covers the bases.

PG-13 Content
All players must be 13 years of age or older to play on Baldur's Gate: The Sword Coast Chronicles.

The minimum age for any PC is at least physically and mentally 18 years old or racial equivalent for all characters made.

This server, the forums, and any interactions within them should be the equivalent of PG-13/Teen. There are to be no violations of this rule, not even within the privacy of an inn room or guild hall. This includes, but is not limited to, excessive vulgarity, gratuitous violence/torture, graphic/extended sexual situations, and explicitly or implicitly sexualizing any characters.

Explicitly or implicitly sexualizing any characters physically or mentally under the age of 18 is an extreme circumstance, and the player(s) guilty will be permanently banned no matter the circumstance, this will be strictly enforced.

Pregnancies are strictly forbidden unless directly supervised by the DM team and approved in advance. Any pregnancies are a form of "retiring" a PC for the duration, and resulting children are NOT to be roleplayed or represented in game in accordance with the rules above.
Active
Larael A half-elf. It's quite fidgety.

Inactive
Arianna, Traveling Sorceress and Monster Slayer - adventuring in Waterdeep
Edazarode, Champion of Tempos - getting drunk with Theodar
Malthus, Eldritch Scholar - brooding in Amn
Nigel Oldfield "Butler of Darkhold" in service [NPC]
User avatar
khaevil
Posts: 136
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:00 pm
Location: East Coast USA

Re: The New Age Rules

Unread post by khaevil »

In response to the question of if age has even come into play.

For me, not even once.

I usually play characters that are 18. Unless they are someone who would have significant schooling like a wizard or they have a significant backstory already 18 is that typical going out into the world age. But it's always just a backstory for me and noone has ever asked how old my PC is. I treat my backstory as personal information and don't spill every last detail of my background to random people I just met.

However I have little doubt that as soon as there's a 25 or older rule I'll run into either:

A rules enforcement wacko who wants to make sure everyone obeys the speed limit by driving that exact speed in the passing lane.

Some pedophile who want to erp a looks-like-14 year old looking for someone under 25 so they can complain that if I make an 18 year old they should be able to as well.
Last edited by khaevil on Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Kurvallaxion Brax - Knight of the Baldur's Gate Thayan Enclave
User avatar
tankteddy
Posts: 424
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:45 am
Location: NV-USA

Re: The New Age Rules

Unread post by tankteddy »

blowuup wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 8:15 pm This would be my version of the rule, I think it covers the bases.

PG-13 Content
All players must be 13 years of age or older to play on Baldur's Gate: The Sword Coast Chronicles.

The minimum age for any PC is at least physically and mentally 18 years old or racial equivalent for all characters made.

This server, the forums, and any interactions within them should be the equivalent of PG-13/Teen. There are to be no violations of this rule, not even within the privacy of an inn room or guild hall. This includes, but is not limited to, excessive vulgarity, gratuitous violence/torture, graphic/extended sexual situations, and explicitly or implicitly sexualizing any characters.

Explicitly or implicitly sexualizing any characters physically or mentally under the age of 18 is an extreme circumstance, and the player(s) guilty will be permanently banned no matter the circumstance, this will be strictly enforced.

Pregnancies are strictly forbidden unless directly supervised by the DM team and approved in advance. Any pregnancies are a form of "retiring" a PC for the duration, and resulting children are NOT to be roleplayed or represented in game in accordance with the rules above.
+1 on this or change it to age 20/21
Theodar Battleforge: "Oi! What dis do?" *BOOM*
Thar Kogan "A har Thar!"
Nevarra Stayanoga "A wolf will always be a wolf."
User avatar
DM SummerBreeze
Retired Staff
Posts: 844
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2020 6:47 pm

Re: The New Age Rules

Unread post by DM SummerBreeze »

blowuup wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 8:15 pm This would be my version of the rule, I think it covers the bases.

PG-13 Content
All players must be 13 years of age or older to play on Baldur's Gate: The Sword Coast Chronicles.

The minimum age for any PC is at least physically and mentally 18 years old or racial equivalent for all characters made.

This server, the forums, and any interactions within them should be the equivalent of PG-13/Teen. There are to be no violations of this rule, not even within the privacy of an inn room or guild hall. This includes, but is not limited to, excessive vulgarity, gratuitous violence/torture, graphic/extended sexual situations, and explicitly or implicitly sexualizing any characters.

Explicitly or implicitly sexualizing any characters physically or mentally under the age of 18 is an extreme circumstance, and the player(s) guilty will be permanently banned no matter the circumstance, this will be strictly enforced.

Pregnancies are strictly forbidden unless directly supervised by the DM team and approved in advance. Any pregnancies are a form of "retiring" a PC for the duration, and resulting children are NOT to be roleplayed or represented in game in accordance with the rules above.
I like your suggestion, but it misses the mark about the vague wording, which is one of the core reasons for the change. We can adjust the age, but I strongly believe we should not go lower than 20 years old. Reasons I already mentioned on the previous page. At the end of it all, as Dialectic mentioned, this is to reduce DM workload for reasons previous mentioned, and lowering it back to 18 just doesn't do that effectively, unfortunately. It's one of those rule changes where we wish we didn't feel we have to make this change, but apparently we do. :cry:
Discord Contact: @E1imination
I only do player requests if a player requests me specifically for a request. Otherwise I run my own written stories. <3
User avatar
DM Gixustrat
Posts: 334
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:52 pm

Re: The New Age Rules

Unread post by DM Gixustrat »

Personally I’ve never made a character under 30 because our characters level so fast, yet we become professional adventurers in a manner of months. Anyone here who’s mastered a mental or physical discipline knows it can take years, in most instances a decade or more. For me one kinda ties into the other.
Loquitur demos mess maet

Player ID: Entreri00
If you urgently need something reach out and maybe I can help.


Server Rules (MUST READ) \ PvP Rules and Guidelines (MUST READ) \ DM Rulings: A Record of DM Decisions
User avatar
Lambe
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 5:38 pm

Re: The New Age Rules

Unread post by Lambe »

..
Last edited by Lambe on Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Lambe
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 5:38 pm

Re: The New Age Rules

Unread post by Lambe »

blowuup wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 8:15 pm
Explicitly or implicitly sexualizing any characters physically or mentally under the age of 18 is an extreme circumstance, and the player(s) guilty will be permanently banned no matter the circumstance, this will be strictly enforced.
The highlighted part is easy to skirt around as only applying to characters who are under the age of 18, which is not allowed to begin with. It must be explicitly stated that a physically 18 years old toon cannot be roleplayed as being any younger in any form by any party IC'ly.
User avatar
blowuup
Posts: 142
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 2:02 am
Location: Las Vegas

Re: The New Age Rules

Unread post by blowuup »

DM SummerBreeze wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:34 pm
blowuup wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 8:15 pm This would be my version of the rule, I think it covers the bases.

PG-13 Content
All players must be 13 years of age or older to play on Baldur's Gate: The Sword Coast Chronicles.

The minimum age for any PC is at least physically and mentally 18 years old or racial equivalent for all characters made.

This server, the forums, and any interactions within them should be the equivalent of PG-13/Teen. There are to be no violations of this rule, not even within the privacy of an inn room or guild hall. This includes, but is not limited to, excessive vulgarity, gratuitous violence/torture, graphic/extended sexual situations, and explicitly or implicitly sexualizing any characters.

Explicitly or implicitly sexualizing any characters physically or mentally under the age of 18 is an extreme circumstance, and the player(s) guilty will be permanently banned no matter the circumstance, this will be strictly enforced.

Pregnancies are strictly forbidden unless directly supervised by the DM team and approved in advance. Any pregnancies are a form of "retiring" a PC for the duration, and resulting children are NOT to be roleplayed or represented in game in accordance with the rules above.
I like your suggestion, but it misses the mark about the vague wording, which is one of the core reasons for the change. We can adjust the age, but I strongly believe we should not go lower than 20 years old. Reasons I already mentioned on the previous page. At the end of it all, as Dialectic mentioned, this is to reduce DM workload for reasons previous mentioned, and lowering it back to 18 just doesn't do that effectively, unfortunately. It's one of those rule changes where we wish we didn't feel we have to make this change, but apparently we do. :cry:
Can you please provide an example of vague wording? I'm having difficulties understanding the concept. If it's too inappropriate, PM is fine.
Active
Larael A half-elf. It's quite fidgety.

Inactive
Arianna, Traveling Sorceress and Monster Slayer - adventuring in Waterdeep
Edazarode, Champion of Tempos - getting drunk with Theodar
Malthus, Eldritch Scholar - brooding in Amn
Nigel Oldfield "Butler of Darkhold" in service [NPC]
User avatar
DM SummerBreeze
Retired Staff
Posts: 844
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2020 6:47 pm

Re: The New Age Rules

Unread post by DM SummerBreeze »

blowuup wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:41 pm
DM SummerBreeze wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:34 pm
blowuup wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 8:15 pm This would be my version of the rule, I think it covers the bases.


I like your suggestion, but it misses the mark about the vague wording, which is one of the core reasons for the change. We can adjust the age, but I strongly believe we should not go lower than 20 years old. Reasons I already mentioned on the previous page. At the end of it all, as Dialectic mentioned, this is to reduce DM workload for reasons previous mentioned, and lowering it back to 18 just doesn't do that effectively, unfortunately. It's one of those rule changes where we wish we didn't feel we have to make this change, but apparently we do. :cry:
Can you please provide an example of vague wording? I'm having difficulties understanding the concept. If it's too inappropriate, PM is fine.
If you go back a page, I actually go into detail about this exact scenario and explain some of why we chose the rule. :D
Discord Contact: @E1imination
I only do player requests if a player requests me specifically for a request. Otherwise I run my own written stories. <3
User avatar
matelener
Retired Staff
Posts: 973
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:02 am

Re: The New Age Rules

Unread post by matelener »

I don't agree with this new ruling because it doesn't prevent anything more than the previous one. In my opinion, there are two gray areas that should be addressed instead:

1) The rule states that every PC must be factually at least X years old. But, it says nothing about the behaviour or the physique of the PC.
2) Can a PC lie about its age in-character? For example, a halfling trying to pass as a child for whatever IC reason.
User avatar
DM SummerBreeze
Retired Staff
Posts: 844
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2020 6:47 pm

Re: The New Age Rules

Unread post by DM SummerBreeze »

Personally, I would propose this change as highlighted:
PG-13 Content
All players must be 13 years of age or older to play on Baldur's Gate: The Sword Coast Chronicles.

Beyond that, though, this server, the forums, and any interactions within them should be the equivalent of PG-13/Teen at most. No violations of this rule, not even within the privacy of an inn room or guild hall. This includes, but is not limited to, excessive vulgarity, gratuitous violence/torture, graphic/extended sexual situations, and explicitly or implicitly sexualizing any characters under the age of 18 or racial equivalent in age.

Pregnancies are strictly forbidden unless directly supervised by the DM team and approved in advance. Any pregnancies are a form of "retiring" a PC for the duration, and resulting children are NOT to be roleplayed or represented in game.

The minimum age for any PC is at least 20 years old or racial equivalent for all characters made. Any form of skirting the rule by use of vague or misleading wording or terminology to attempt to describe or insinuate a character as being physicially in appearance, or mentally underage is strictly forbidden and is considered breaking the character age rule. Breaking this rule is a considered a severe offense and can result in serious consequences.

----


Unusual Characters
Every PC must be a legal adult (at least 20 years of age for humans or the racial equivalent for nonhumans). No exceptions except as outlined in the rules on the PG-13 content for the server.


----



– Content = Teen
– The Server, Forum and all interactions are to be rated Teen or below. ERP/sexual encounters (other than fade to black scenes), graphic or extended nudity, gratuitous violence and torture, and especially rape or miscarriage are strictly prohibited. Pregnancies are forbidden unless directly supervised by the DM team and approved in advance. Any pregnancies are a form of "retiring" a PC for the duration, and resulting children are NOT to be roleplayed or represented in game. The minimum age for any PC is 20 years old or racial equivalent except as outlined in the rules on the PG-13 content for the server.
Discord Contact: @E1imination
I only do player requests if a player requests me specifically for a request. Otherwise I run my own written stories. <3
User avatar
Asmodea
Posts: 353
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 4:33 pm

Re: The New Age Rules

Unread post by Asmodea »

DM SummerBreeze wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:34 pm At the end of it all, as Dialectic mentioned, this is to reduce DM workload for reasons previous mentioned, and lowering it back to 18 just doesn't do that effectively, unfortunately. It's one of those rule changes where we wish we didn't feel we have to make this change, but apparently we do. :cry:
Many in the community are willing to step up to help manage the work load of making sure the server remains a safe place to RP. Many in the community support a no-tolerance policy towards infractions in regards to under-age RP as well. If anything I am concerned that the rule change will not curb behavior at all and it is a Band-Aid fix to a spurting wound. As complaints of this kind are common (which is a kind of scary thought) that says to me that more effort needs to be put towards curbing it than adding two years to the minimum age of PCs.

The difference between: 'You can't insinuate you are younger than 20 years old' and 'You can't insinuate you are younger than 18 years old' does not seem a huge gaping difference... is this entirely boiling down to the use of the word teenager or adolescent? If so. Context should be pretty clear.
Player of Isabella Villame
---------------------------------------------
"You are what you often do."
User avatar
khaevil
Posts: 136
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:00 pm
Location: East Coast USA

Re: The New Age Rules

Unread post by khaevil »

There are two things I see lacking in trying to stop this:

You need a rule that makes the behavior against the rules, and raising the age doesn't do that. The starting age could be 8,000 and they'd roll up an 8,000 year old immortal that doesn't look a day over 12 and has amnesia so they are naive. 18 is important since it has legal ramifications, but 18 works just as well as 8,000.

And then you need enforcement. It's going to be a constant problem because people can buy new CD keys pretty cheap and change their IP address or use a proxy to mask it. There's no easy way around that but it looks like you've got plenty of volunteers.


These are probably the same players who have been around for years. The NWN2 community is packed full of an abnormally high fraction of white supremacists and people with all sorts of deviant fantasies they can't safely act upon in real life. I suspect they come here to roleplay the behavior that in real life would get them arrested, where here the worst that can happen is they get banned.
Kurvallaxion Brax - Knight of the Baldur's Gate Thayan Enclave
User avatar
Rhifox
Custom Content
Posts: 3964
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 2:34 am

Re: The New Age Rules

Unread post by Rhifox »

DM SummerBreeze wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:52 pm Personally, I would propose this change as highlighted:
PG-13 Content
All players must be 13 years of age or older to play on Baldur's Gate: The Sword Coast Chronicles.

Beyond that, though, this server, the forums, and any interactions within them should be the equivalent of PG-13/Teen at most. No violations of this rule, not even within the privacy of an inn room or guild hall. This includes, but is not limited to, excessive vulgarity, gratuitous violence/torture, graphic/extended sexual situations, and explicitly or implicitly sexualizing any characters under the age of 18 or racial equivalent in age.

Pregnancies are strictly forbidden unless directly supervised by the DM team and approved in advance. Any pregnancies are a form of "retiring" a PC for the duration, and resulting children are NOT to be roleplayed or represented in game.

The minimum age for any PC is at least 20 years old or racial equivalent for all characters made. Any form of skirting the rule by use of vague or misleading wording or terminology to attempt to describe or insinuate a character as being physicially in appearance, or mentally underage is strictly forbidden and is considered breaking the character age rule. Breaking this rule is a considered a severe offense and can result in serious consequences.

----


Unusual Characters
Every PC must be a legal adult (at least 20 years of age for humans or the racial equivalent for nonhumans). No exceptions except as outlined in the rules on the PG-13 content for the server.


----



– Content = Teen
– The Server, Forum and all interactions are to be rated Teen or below. ERP/sexual encounters (other than fade to black scenes), graphic or extended nudity, gratuitous violence and torture, and especially rape or miscarriage are strictly prohibited. Pregnancies are forbidden unless directly supervised by the DM team and approved in advance. Any pregnancies are a form of "retiring" a PC for the duration, and resulting children are NOT to be roleplayed or represented in game. The minimum age for any PC is 20 years old or racial equivalent except as outlined in the rules on the PG-13 content for the server.
This is more or less fine by me.

The only thing I would change is this line:
Unusual Characters
Every PC must be a legal adult (at least 20 years of age for humans or the racial equivalent for nonhumans). No exceptions except as outlined in the rules on the PG-13 content for the server.
to

"Every PC must be at least 20 years of age for humans or the racial equivalent for nonhumans. No exceptions as outlined in the rules on the PG-13 content for the server."

or

"Every PC must be a legal adult and at least 20 years of age for humans or the racial equivalent for nonhumans. No exceptions as outlined in the rules on the PG-13 content for the server."

The way it is currently written is implying that 20 is the age of majority in-universe, when that is not the case.


Also a remaining '18' number was missed here:
This includes, but is not limited to, excessive vulgarity, gratuitous violence/torture, graphic/extended sexual situations, and explicitly or implicitly sexualizing any characters under the age of 18 or racial equivalent in age.
Tarina — The Witch of Darkhold, a dealer in spirits and black magic
User avatar
zhazz
Posts: 849
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2020 7:12 am

Re: The New Age Rules

Unread post by zhazz »

DM SummerBreeze wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:52 pm Personally, I would propose this change as highlighted:
The minimum age for any PC is at least 20 years old or racial equivalent for all characters made. Any form of skirting the rule by use of vague or misleading wording or terminology to attempt to describe or insinuate a character as being physicially in appearance, or mentally underage is strictly forbidden and is considered breaking the character age rule. Breaking this rule is a considered a severe offense and can result in serious consequences.
I'm a bit on the fence about this. Characters with autism/Asperger's are fully functioning adults, but can be perceived as being mentally underage. I'd even argue that a decent proportion of the Faerûnian population could/would be diagnosed with such, if going my modern medicine standards. Mainly they will be found among wizard's apprentices, and craftsmen; considered savants within their professions. And that's even before considering adventurers.

It's a thankless task to draw the line, and there's likely no good answer. That being said, I will propose my own change.
The minimum age for any PC is at least 20 years old or racial equivalent for all characters made.

Any form of skirting this rule is considered a severe offense, and can result in serious consequences. This includes, but is not limited to: use of vague/misleading wording or terminology describing or insinuating a character as being physically or mentally younger.

Characters with mental/emotional deficiencies are allowed, but will be held to a higher standard. Savants, and characters with autism or Asperger's fall under this category.
Is it perfect? No. Because there is no perfect version. Is it better? I think so, yes.
Adrian Baker - An innocent virtuoso (bio | journal)
Relyth Ravan'Thala - Bear of an Elf
Timothy Daleson - Paladin Wand Maker
Duncan Matsirani - A wanderer
Post Reply

Return to “Rules”